Modelling Construction Dust Safety Distance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction dust may lead to Silicosis, a disabling respiratory disease which severely threatens the life of construction workers. Therefore, it is important to predict and determine the safety area of dust generated by the construction process and the corresponding protective measures that must be adopted. In this paper, based on real site data, we modelled and simulated the pneumatic drill holes in rock drilling processes to analyze the dust distribution on construction sites. Our simulation results show that the dangerous distance from the pneumatic drill hole is 3.5m. Within the dangerous distance, the dust concentration ranged from 0.039 mg/m3to30mg/m3, and decreased as distance increases. Within the dangerous distance, dust alleviation technologies are strongly recommended and appropriate protective measures must be adopted by construction workers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1065-1069)

Pages:

1704-1709

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Thorpe A, Ritchie AS, Gibson MJ, Brown RC. Measurements of the effectiveness of dust control on cut-off saws used in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg 1999; 43: 443–56.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(99)00038-1

Google Scholar

[2] Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Noderer KS, Schenker MB, Vallyathan V, Olenchock S. Personal Exposure to Dust, Endotoxin and Crystalline Silica in California Agriculture. Ann Occup Hyg 1999; 43: 35–42.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00068-4

Google Scholar

[3] Lumens MEGL, Spee T. Determinants of exposure to respirable quartz dust in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg 2001; 45: 585–95.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(01)00025-4

Google Scholar

[4] Collins JF, Salmon AG, Brown JP, Marty MA, Alexeeff GV. Development of a chronic inhalation reference level for respirable crystalline silica. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2005; 43: 292–300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.08.003

Google Scholar

[5] Ehrlich C, Noll G, Wusterhausen E, Kalkoff W-D, Remus R, Lehmann C. Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) emissions from industrial plants – Results from measurement programmes in Germany. Atmos Environ 2013; 68: 278–85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.069

Google Scholar

[6] Estellita L, Santos AMA, Anjos RM, Yoshimura EM, Velasco H, da Silva AAR, et al. Analysis and risk estimates to workers of Brazilian granitic industries and sandblasters exposed to respirable crystalline silica and natural radionuclides. Radiat Meas 2010; 45: 196–203.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.02.009

Google Scholar

[7] Lanzafame R, Mauro S, Messina M. 2D CFD Modeling of H-Darrieus Wind Turbines Using a Transition Turbulence Model. Energy Procedia 2014; 45: 131–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.015

Google Scholar

[8] Orbe A, Losada R, Rojí E, Cuadrado J, Maturana A. The prediction of bending strengths in SFRSCC using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Constr Build Mater 2014; 66: 587–96.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.003

Google Scholar

[9] Yu X, Makkawi Y, Ocone R, Huard M, Briens C, Berruti F. A CFD study of biomass pyrolysis in a downer reactor equipped with a novel gas–solid separator — I: Hydrodynamic performance. Fuel Process Technol 2014; 126: 366–82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.05.020

Google Scholar

[10] Murillo C, Dufaud O, Bardin-Monnier N, López O, Munoz F, Perrin L. Dust explosions: CFD modeling as a tool to characterize the relevant parameters of the dust dispersion. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 104: 103–16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.07.029

Google Scholar

[11] Lin C-H, Yen C-H, Ferng Y-M. CFD investigating the flow characteristics in a triangular-pitch rod bundle using Reynolds stress turbulence model. Ann Nucl Energy 2014; 65: 357–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.023

Google Scholar

[12] Diego I, Pelegry A, Torno S, Toraño J, Menendez M. Simultaneous CFD evaluation of wind flow and dust emission in open storage piles. Appl Math Model 2009; 33: 3197–207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2008.10.037

Google Scholar

[13] Launder B, Spalding D. Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence. Academic Press; (1972).

Google Scholar

[14] Lee I-B, Bitog JPP, Hong S-W, Seo I-H, Kwon K-S, Bartzanas T, et al. The past, present and future of CFD for agro-environmental applications. Comput Electron Agric 2013; 93: 168–83.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.006

Google Scholar

[15] Di Sarli V, Russo P, Sanchirico R, Di Benedetto A. CFD simulations of dust dispersion in the 20 L vessel: Effect of nominal dust concentration. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2014; 27: 8–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.10.015

Google Scholar

[16] Klippel A, Schmidt M, Muecke O, Krause U. Dust concentration measurements during filling of a silo and CFD modeling of filling processes regarding exceeding the lower explosion limit. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2014; 29: 122–37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.02.006

Google Scholar

[17] Ren T, Wang Z, Cooper G. CFD modelling of ventilation and dust flow behaviour above an underground bin and the design of an innovative dust mitigation system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2014; 41: 241–54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2014.01.002

Google Scholar

[18] Edited by Eller PM, Cassinelli ME. NIOSH: Aniline, o-toluidine, and nitrobenzene. Method 2005. In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 4th edition. Natl Inst Occup Saf Health NIOSH 1998: Publication No. 98–119.

Google Scholar

[19] Merchant JA, Boehlecke BA, Taylor G, Pickett-Harner M. Occupational respiratory diseases. US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Centers for Disease Control. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; (1986).

DOI: 10.1037/e371642004-001

Google Scholar