The Study of the Effect of Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) on the New Bone Regeneration of Immediate Implant

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objective: To study the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on reducing bone resorption in immediate implant. Methods: 20 immediate implant patients were divided into two groups, each group included 10 patients who were treated by adding CGF or Bio-oss to the gap of implant-bone, respectively; the labial new bone regeneration was evaluated in postoperative 1 years using cone beam CT. Results: The buccal bone width variation of the CGF group was 0.85±0.25mm, and the Bio-oss group was 0.35±0.25mm (p <0.05). Conclusion: The CGF has no significant role in promoting new bone regeneration when was used alone in the gap of implant - bone in immediate implant

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

500-502

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Walker P, EnklingN, Mericske-Stern R, et al. Immediate implant placement in mandible and prosthetic rehabilitation by means of all-zirconium oxide restorations: case report of a woman with a history of periodontitis. Quintessence Int. 2014 May; 45(5): 397-404.

Google Scholar

[2] Sanz-Martín I , Sanz-Martn I, Figuero E, et al. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jun 11.

DOI: 10.1111/clr.12428

Google Scholar

[3] Susarla SM, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Delayed versus immediate loading of implants: survival analysis and risk factors for dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb; 66(2): 251-5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.012

Google Scholar

[4] Sohn DS, Lee JS, Ahn MR, et al. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus without bone grafts. Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 321–331.

DOI: 10.1097/id.0b013e318182f01b

Google Scholar

[5] Kim TH, Kim SH, Kim YD. Comparison of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and concentrated growth factor (CGF) in rabbit-skull defect healing. Arch Oral Biol. 2014 May; 59(5): 550-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.02.004

Google Scholar

[6] Honda H, Tamai N, Naka N, et al. Bone tissue engineering with bone marrow-derived stromal cells integrated with concentrated growth factor in Rattus norvegicus calvaria defect model. J Artif Organs. 2013 Sep; 16(3): 305-15.

DOI: 10.1007/s10047-013-0711-7

Google Scholar

[7] Yu B, Wang Z. Effect of concentrated growth factors on beagle periodontal ligament stem cells in vitro. Mol Med Rep. 2014 Jan; 9(1): 235-42.

DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1756

Google Scholar

[8] Rodella LF, Favero G, Boninsegna R, et al. Growth factors, CD34 positive cells, and fibrin network analysis in concentrated growth factors fraction. Microsc Res Tech. 2011 Aug; 74(8): 772-7.

DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20968

Google Scholar

[9] Sohn DS, Moon JW, LeeWH, et al. Comparison of new bone formation in the maxillary sinus with and without bone grafts: Immunochemical rabbit study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 1033–1042.

Google Scholar