Numerical Analysis of the Influence of Graphite Nodule Size on the Pitting Resistance of Austepered Ductile Iron Gears

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, an experimental study of wear evaluation in combination with a finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out for austempered ductile iron (ADI) used in gears. Two different ADI materials were used to produce gears which were tested in a FZG back-to-back test rig. The experimental results were compared to those of carburized AISI 8620 steel and induction hardened AISI 4140 steel gears. The wear resistance for pitting and spalling on the gears surfaces were measured using image analysis. Comparing the two types of ADI, the one with smaller nodules showed a higher pitting resistance. In contact fatigue tests with severe load, the carburized AISI 8620 steel proved to be superior to ADI. However, ADI with smaller nodule size presented wear resistance similar to that of induction hardened AISI 4140 steel. The FEA was conducted using the commercial code ANSYS 11.0 and aimed to provide a better understanding of the microstructural effect on the stress state of subsurface regions. From the numerical results in ADIs, it was concluded that the nodule size affects the gears life independently of the mechanical properties of the matrix. The size and number of nodules affects both the nucleation and the propagation stages of cracks. ADIs with higher amount of nodules have a superior wear resistance by pitting. Also, compared to the Hertz contact theory (valid for isotropic materials), the presence of graphite nodules induced the maximum shear stress point moves toward the surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1120-1121)

Pages:

763-772

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Zammit, S. Abela, L. Wagner, M. Mhaede, M. Grech, Tribological behaviour of shot peened Cu–Ni austempered ductile iron, Wear 302 (2013) 829–836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.027

Google Scholar

[2] J. Lefevre , K.L. Hayrynen, Austempered Materials for Powertrain Applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22 (2013) 1914–(1922).

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-013-0557-4

Google Scholar

[3] J. Aranzabal, G. Serramoglia, C.A. Goria C.A., D. Rousière, Development of a mixed (ferritic-ausferritic) ductile iron for automotive suspension parts, Int. J. Cast Metal. Res. 16 (2003) 185–190.

DOI: 10.1080/13640461.2003.11819580

Google Scholar

[4] R.C. Dommarco, A.J. Jaureguiberry, J.A. Sikora, Rolling contact fatigue resistance of ductile iron with different nodule counts and matrix microstructures, Wear 261 (2006) 172–179.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.09.015

Google Scholar

[5] B. Stokes1, N. Gao, P.A.S. Reed, Effects of graphite nodules on crack growth behaviour of austempered ductile iron, Mat. Sci. Eng. A - Struct. 445–446 (2007) 374–385.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.058

Google Scholar

[6] G.L. Greno, J.L. Otegui, R.E. Boeri, Mechanisms of fatigue crack growth in ADI, Int. J. Fatigue 21 (1999) 35–43.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(98)00055-3

Google Scholar

[7] P.P. Rao, S.K. Putatunda, Investigations on the fracture toughness of austempered ductile irons austenitized at different temperatures, Mat. Sci. Eng. A - Struct. 349 (2003) 136–149.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00633-0

Google Scholar

[8] L. Magalhães, R. Martins, J. Seabra, R. Gonçalves, Low torque loss gears: austempered ductile iron versus carburized steel, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: J. Eng. Tribol. 225 (2011) 1209–1216.

DOI: 10.1177/1350650111415483

Google Scholar

[9] R. Martins, J. Seabra J, L. Magalhães, Austempered ductile iron (ADI) gears: power loss, pitting and micropitting, Wear 264 (2008) 838–849.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.05.007

Google Scholar

[10] L. Magalhães, R. Martins, J. Seabra, Low-loss austempered ductile iron gears: Experimental evaluation comparing materials and lubricants, Tribol. Int. 46 (2011) 97–105.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.06.015

Google Scholar

[11] FVA Information Sheet No. 2/IV, Influence of Lubricant on the Pitting Capacity of Case Carburized Gears in Load-Spectra and Single-Stage-Investigations, Forschungsvereinigung Antriebstechnik, (1997).

Google Scholar

[12] L.H.A. Gans, J.A.B. Martinez, F. Koda W.L. Guesser, C.H. Silva, Effect of nodule graphite size on the wear resistance of ADI: a finite element study, 2nd International Brazilian Conference on Tribology - TriboBr'2014, (2014).

DOI: 10.5151/1472-5836-25314

Google Scholar

[13] K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1987).

Google Scholar

[14] ANSYS, ANSYS Workbench Version 11. 0, USA, (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] S.K. Pradhan, B.B. Nayak, S.S. Sahay, B.K. Mishra, Mechanical properties of graphite flakes and spherulites measured by nanoindentation, Carbon 47 (2009) 2290–2299.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.024

Google Scholar

[16] M. Dahlberg, Fatigue crack propagation in nodular graphite cast iron, Int. J. Cast Metal. Res. 17 (2004) 29–37.

DOI: 10.1179/136404604225012398

Google Scholar