Parameter Design for Hardness of Metal Filled Epoxy Matrix

Article Preview

Abstract:

Epoxy is blended with metal fillers to enhance its performance and application for tooling. Material used contains aluminium particles (Rencast CW47), blended with brass separately. Brass is added into the matrix based on 10%, 20% and 30% of the epoxy mix weight ratio. Using Taguchi method, controls factor such as pre-curing temperature (A), filler percentage (B), degassing time (C), curing time (D) and post curing temperature (E) are selected parameters in order to determine optimum conditions. Noise strategy is adopted for material cooling via ambient (N1) and oven temperatures (N2), which gave different hardness values of the epoxy composite. Optimum parameters were decided based on the prediction of S/N ratio, where A = Room temperature, B = 20%, C = 60 minutes, D = 14 hours and E = 1800C. The most significant control factor is de-gassing time for both fillers, and percentage of filler to weight ratio of epoxy mixture is optimum at 20%. It was found that brass gave higher mean hardness values, (Hv = 24.1) compared to copper (Hv = 22.7) and aluminium filled epoxy (Hv = 22.3) based on the prediction run, and suitable as additional filler to improve the surface toughness of epoxy matrix as inserts. Confirmation run was conducted according to the optimum parameters and validated the gain values for brass at 7.98. Fillers enhance the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix by increasing hardness of mould cavity and core. This work helped to design the best control factors to produce optimum hardness conditions for filled epoxy matrix.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

152-156

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.F. Jacobs, Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies – from Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): New York, (1996).

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x9600400209

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ma, I. Gibson, G. Balaji, Q.J. Hu, Development of epoxy matrix composites for rapid tooling applications. J. of Mat. Proc. Tech., (2007), 192-193, 75-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.086

Google Scholar

[3] M.S. Bhagyashekar, M.V.G.K. Rao, Characterization of mechanical behavior of metallic and non-metallic particulate filled epoxy matrix composites. J. of Reinforced Plastics and Composites (2010), 29: 30, 30 – 42.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684408095034

Google Scholar

[4] Rencast CW47 Datasheet March 2007. Huntsman, Adv. Materials GmbH, Switzerland.

Google Scholar

[5] Neukadur VG SP 5 Datasheet 2008. Altropol Kunststoff GmbH, Germany.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Tomori, S. Melkote, M. Konis, Injection mould performance of machined ceramic filled epoxy tooling boards, J. of Mat. Proc. Tech. (2004), 145, 126-133.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00881-1

Google Scholar

[7] P.V. Vasconcelos, F.G. Lino, A.M. Baptisa, R.J.L. Neto, Tribological behaviour of epoxy based composites for rapid tooling, Wear, (2006), Vol. 260, Issue 1-2, 30-39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.12.030

Google Scholar

[8] M.S. Bhagyashekar, K. Rao & M.V.G.K. Rao, Studies on rheological and physical properties of metallic and non-metallic particulate filled epoxy composites, J. of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, (2009), Vol. 28, 2869 – 2878.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684408093976

Google Scholar

[9] Wu, Y & Wu, A., Taguchi Methods for Robust Design. ASME: New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] Zhu, J., Chen, J.C. & Kirby, E. D, Tensile Strength and Optimization of Injection Moulding Processing Parameters Using the Taguchi Method, Int. J. of Modern Engineering (2004), Vol. 4 No. 2.

Google Scholar

[11] 1st International Conference on Robust Quality Engineering, April 22 – 26, 2013. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

Google Scholar