Experimental Analysis of Floc Formation Time and Order in Coagulation Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The floc formation time and order were identified with the laser method while three kinds of coagulants such as polyaluminum chloride, ferric chloride, and aluminum sulfate were tested for comparison of their coagulation process. Floc formation time of three coagulants tended to decrease with the increase of coagulant dose and turbidity. When the pH was 7, floc formation time of PAC、Al2(SO4)3 were smaller than that of other pH conditions. The minimum formation time of FeCl3 occurred when the pH was 6. The minimum dose for floc formation was 0.68, 0.88, and 1.04 mg/L for PAC, FeCl3, and Al2(SO4)3, respectively. It was also found that the floc formation order of PAC was the largest among three coagulants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1058-1062

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wang D, Tang H, Gregory J. Relative importance of charge neutralization and precipitation on coagulation of kaolin with PACl: effect of sulfate ion. Environ Sci Technol. Vol. 36 (2002), p.1815.

DOI: 10.1021/es001936a

Google Scholar

[2] Tao Li , Zhe Zhu , Dongsheng Wang,Characterization of f loc size, strength and structure under various coagulation mechanisms,Powder Technology. Vol. 168 (2006), p.104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.07.003

Google Scholar

[3] Stone. M, Krishnappan.B. G,Floc morphology and size distributions of cohesive sediment in steady-state flow,Water Research. Vol. 37(2003), p.2739.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00082-4

Google Scholar

[4] Gautam A K, Kumar S, Sabumon P. C, Preliminary study of physico-chemical treatment options for hospital wastewater, Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 83 (2007), p.298.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.03.009

Google Scholar

[5] Jarvis P, Jefferson B, Parsons S, Floc structural characteristics using conventional coagulation for a high doc, low alkalinity surface water source, Water Research. Vol. 40 (2006), p.2727.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.024

Google Scholar

[6] Annadurai G, Sung S. S, Lee D. J. Floc Characteristics and Removal of Turbidity and Humic Acid from High-Turbidity Storm Water, Journal of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 129(2003), p.571.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2003)129:6(571)

Google Scholar

[7] Xu, G. R. Fitzpatrick, C.S.B. Gregory, J. Floc formation, size distribution and its transformation detected by online laser particle counter, Separation Science and Technology. Vol. 43(2008), p.1725.

DOI: 10.1080/01496390801973706

Google Scholar

[8] Gregory D, Carlson K. Relationship of pH and floc formation kinetics to granular media filtration performance. Environ Sci Technol. Vol. 37(2003), p.1398.

DOI: 10.1021/es025801b

Google Scholar

[9] McCurdy K, Carlson K, Gregory D, Floc morphology and cyclic shearing recovery: comparison ofalum and polyaluminum chloride coagulants, Water Research. Vol. 38 (2004), p.486.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.005

Google Scholar

[10] Randolph, A. D, Larson, M.A. Theory of particulate processes. Academic Press. (1988).

Google Scholar