Studies of Ecological Environment Management in the New Countryside Construction Progress

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to build the rural ecological civilization, and promote the building of a new socialist countryside, we must attach importance to rural environmental protection. By analyzing the water pollution, soil pollution and solid waste pollution situation in the new countryside construction progress, this paper indicate that three major reasons of the rural ecological environment multiple pollution are pollution-intensive industries rapiddly transferring to rural, excessive use of chemicals and unreasonable use of land, and finally conclude ecological and environmental protection measures: improve the rural ecological environmental protection policies, regulations and standards system; strengthen the government's role in the management of the ecological environment; establish a sound environmental management system in rural areas; and increase environmental publicity, education and training efforts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

1143-1146

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Office of State Department. opinion on strengthen rural environmental protectionwork, 2007, 11, 13.

Google Scholar

[2] Wei Xin, Liu Xinliang, Su Yang. Characteristics of Pollution in Rural Habitats and Analysis on Causation China Development,2007, 7(4): 92-98.

Google Scholar

[3] ZhangLiJian, ZhuLiZhi. Rural environmental problems and countermeasures[J]. Agro-Environm ent and Development,2007, 6: 1-6.

Google Scholar

[4] Han Jun. China's environmental governance problems and countermeasures [J]. China's pop ulation Resources and Environment, 2007 (6) : 153-154.

Google Scholar

[5] Xu XiuZhen, Yan ShuangBo. thinking of the government role in Environmental pollution co ntrol[J]. Southern Forum, 2006, 4: 44-49.

Google Scholar