Evaluation for Antifreeze of Concrete Based on Method of Bubble Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays we usually use air bubble parameter to evaluate the freeing resistance. This method save time, water and electricity. However, this method is too simple to reduce the accuracy and limit its application. For changing this fact we stood the minimum observation Wire length and standard maintenance age influence on air Bubble parameters. Firstly According to air bladder spacing coefficient of the different traverse wire length, calculate the range and deviation coefficient. Secendly detect the antifreeze degree by rapid freeze-thawing test, finaly set up the regression equation among the air spacing coefficient of 3d,28d and 90d. In conclusion, wire length should take at least 2 times of the now minmum. We cannot directly use the spacing coefficient of bubble in 3d to evaluate the freezing resistance of the concrete structure. But we can use equation y = 0.356x +0.514 to convert that of 90d to 28d and evaluate the freezing resistance of the concrete structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

2262-2265

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Water. Conservancy project Concretes Experiment Regulations. DL/T5150-2001 (China).

Google Scholar

[2] Wu Zhongwei, Lian Huizhen: High Performance Concretes. (Chinese Railroad Publishing house, Beijing 1999).

Google Scholar

[3] Pu Xincheng: Concretes Study. (China Building Industry Publishing house, Beijing 1981).

Google Scholar

[4] Fu Wenquan, Han Sufang: Concretes Project Crack Analysis and Control. (Chinese Railroad Publishing house, Beijing 2002).

Google Scholar

[5] Chen Jiankui: Concretes Admixture Principle and Application. (Chinese Plan Publishing house, Beijing 1997).

Google Scholar