Factor Analysis of Mining Waste Land Development Based on ISM

Article Preview

Abstract:

The long-term exploitation of mineral resources, not only destroyed the natural landscape such as topography, but also triggered a series of ecological and social problems. This paper analyzed influencing factors and process of mining waste land development based on Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM), and found a structural model. The results told that the Government played an important role in mining waste land development. The government promotes the mining waste land development by influencing the environmental, economic and infrastructure, and makes the waste land fully reflects its economic, social and environmental values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

27-32

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Tedd, J.A. Charles, R. Driscoll. Sustainable brownfield re-development-risk management [J]. Engineering Geology, Volume 60, Issues 1-4, June 2001: 333-339.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00113-7

Google Scholar

[2] G. Christopher Wedding, Douglas Crawford-Brown. Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 85, Issue 2, October 2007: 483-495.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.018

Google Scholar

[3] Niu Yan-chun. Factors and Countermeasures Analysis of Coal Mining Waste Land Reclamation.

Google Scholar

[4] Peter Nijkamp, Caroline A. Rodenburg, Alfred J. Wagtendonk. Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: A comparative case study approach to polluted sites [J]. Ecological Economics, Volume 40, Issue 2, February 2002: 235-252.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00256-7

Google Scholar

[5] Ye Chen, Keith W. Hipel, D. Marc Kilgour, Yuming Zhu. A strategic classification support system for brownfield redevelopment [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, Volume 24, Issue 5, May 2009: 647-654.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.011

Google Scholar

[6] Linda McCarthy. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals [J]. Land Use Policy, Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2002: 287-296.

DOI: 10.1016/s0264-8377(02)00023-6

Google Scholar

[7] K.J. Doick, G. Sellers, V. Castan-Broto, T. Silverthorne. Understanding success in the context of brownfield greening projects: The requirement for outcome evaluation in urban greenspace success assessment [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 8, Issue 3, 2009: 163-178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.002

Google Scholar

[8] Kris Wernstedt, Robert Hersh. Brownfields regulatory reform and policy innovation in practice.

Google Scholar

[9] Zheng Hua-yu, Shen Lei. Evaluation studies on intensive use of urban land - the development of Shenzhen City as an example [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, Volume 23, Issue 6, November 2008: 1009-1021.

Google Scholar