Application of a Hybrid Process with Biofilm and Suspended Biomass for Treating Petrochemical Wastewater

Article Preview

Abstract:

To improve the efficiency of petrochemical wastewater treatment, a hybrid system with both attached and suspended biomass was proposed to replace the existing biofilm process. According to the performances of the hybrid system, the optimal suspended biomass concentration in the tank was determined around 1000 mg/L. When the average influent COD and NH4+-N concentration were 395.7 mg/L and 13.5 mg/L, the according removal efficiencies of the hybrid system were up to 84% and 69%, compared to 74% and 20% when operated with the biofilm system. The GC-MS analysis showed that both the amounts and types of refractory organics in the effluent of hybrid system were greatly reduced when compared with those of the previous biofilm process. The foaming problem was also resolved along with the enhanced pollutants removal efficiency. The hybrid process was an economic and feasible alternative for petrochemical wastewater treatment, which ensured carbonaceous oxidation, nitrification and decomposition of refractory substances.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 113-116)

Pages:

469-473

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Ma, J.B. Guo, L.J. Zhao, C.C. Chang and D. Cui: Bioresource Technology Vol. 100 (2009), pp.597-602.

Google Scholar

[2] L.J. Zhao, F. Ma, J.B. Guo and Q.L. Zhao: Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, Vol. 8 (2007), pp.1831-1838.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Heard, E. Harvey, B.B. Johnson, J.D. Wells and M.J. Angove: Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces Vol. 63 (2008), pp.21-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.10.011

Google Scholar

[4] A. Chavan and S. Mukherji: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 154 (2008), pp.63-72.

Google Scholar

[5] T.Y. Hsien and Y.H. Lin: Biochemical Engineering Journal Vol. 27 (2005), pp.95-103.

Google Scholar

[6] H.A. Al-Sharekh and M.F. Hamoda: Water Science and Technology Vol. 43 (2001), pp.321-326.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Artiga, V. Oyanedel, J.M. Garrldo and R. Méndez: Desalination Vol. 179 (2005), pp.171-179.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Artiga, G. García-Toriello, R. Méndez and J.M. Garrido: Desalination, Vol. 221 (2008), pp.518-525.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.112

Google Scholar

[9] M. Fouad and R. Bhargava: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 74 (2005), pp.245-253.

Google Scholar

[10] M.F. Hamoda and H.A. Al-Sharekh: Water Science and Technology Vol. 41 (2000), pp.167-175.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Mazumder and A.K. Dikshit: International Journal of Environment and Pollution Vol. 21 (2004), pp.105-131.

Google Scholar

[12] J.H. Seok and S.J. Komisa: Environmental Technology Vol. 24. (2003), pp.21-42.

Google Scholar

[13] J.L. Su and C.F. Ouyang: Water Science and Technology Vol. 34 (1996), pp.477-486.

Google Scholar

[14] S.J. You, C.L. Hsu and C.F. Quyang: Water Research Vol. 37 (2003), pp.2281-2290.

Google Scholar

[15] S.J. You and C.F. Ouyang: Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 131 (2005), pp.883-891.

Google Scholar

[16] G.H. Chen, J.C. Huang and M.C. Lo Irene: Water Science and Technology Vol. 35 (1997), pp.81-89.

Google Scholar

[17] B.Z. Wang: Water Science and Technology Vol. 24 (1991), pp.197-213.

Google Scholar

[18] State Environmental Protection Administration of China: Water and Wastewater Aanalytical Methods (4th edn) (China Environmental Press, Beijing 2002).

Google Scholar

[19] R. Cresson, R. Escudié, J.P. Steyer, J.P. Delgenès and N. Bernet: Water Reseach Vol. 42 (2008), pp.792-800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.013

Google Scholar

[20] C.Y. Lee: Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 118 (1992), pp.982-987.

Google Scholar

[21] C.Y. Lee and Y.W. Lang: Journal of Environmental Engineering Vol. 125 (1999), pp.146-152.

Google Scholar