Comparison of the EHLA and LPBF Process in Context of New Alloy Design Methods for LPBF

Article Preview

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes are becoming more and more important for production of parts with increasing geometrical complexity and functionality. However, to draw on the full potential of AM technologies, alloys that exploit process inherent particularities such as extremely high cooling rates (ca. 106 K/s) have to be developed. One of most important AM-processes is Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), a batch-wise process. This complicates experimental alloy development and increases the use of powder resources since only one chemical composition can be tested within one test job and the process chamber has to be cleaned carefully in between. The process Extreme High-Speed Laser Material Deposition (EHLA) has been found to have similar cooling rates as LPBF, however it uses an in situ supply of powders which allows an easy switching between materials and has potential for rapid alloy development methods. Since the mechanical properties of materials primarily depend on chemical composition and microstructure, which in turn depends heavily on the cooling rates in the production process, the EHLA-process could be used as a means for an accelerated alloy development for LPBF. However, to explore this possibility, a thorough comparison of the two processes has to be performed.In this work, EHLA and LPBF processes are compared and evaluated regarding the following characteristics: process parameters, laser intensities and volume energy densities, resulting microstructure (primary dendrite arm spacing, DAS), melt pool size and shape. The reference samples were manufactured using one set of LPBF process parameters and EHLA samples were manufactured using three different sets of process parameters.The volume energy densities Ev [J/mm³] of the processes were found to differ by a factor 2.4 with higher Ev observed in LPBF. However, considering that approximately 2 to 3 layers are remelted with each pass of the laser beam, the introduced Ev per pass approximates the Ev introduced in the EHLA process. The melt pool size as seen in a cross section in the EHLA-manufactured samples is approximately 25 times larger than in the LPBF-manufactured samples and its depth to width ratio (d/w ratio) can be attributed to a heat conduction welding process while the d/w ratio observed in the LPBF-manufactured sample suggests a transition process between heat conduction welding and deep welding. The observed DAS is in the same order of magnitude for both processes ranging from 0.55 to 1.15 µm in EHLA-manufactured samples and 0.73 µm in the LPBF-manufactured reference sample. Since the resulting microstructures of samples manufactured with both processes show this common feature and EHLA process parameters can be adjusted to control the cooling rates, the transferability between EHLA- and LPBF-processes is supported in this first investigation. Research for a more efficient alloy development for LPBF using EHLA will be continued by e.g. examining chemical compositions and performing mechanical testing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Ford and M. Despeisse, Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production (2016, Volume 137), p.1573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150

Google Scholar

[2] D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk and C. Emmelmann, Additive manufacturing of metals, Acta Materialia (2016, Volume 117), p.371.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019

Google Scholar

[3] C. Klahn, B. Leutenecker and M. Meboldt, Design Strategies for the Process of Additive Manufacturing, Procedia CIRP (2015, Volume 36), p.230.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.082

Google Scholar

[4] M.K. Thompson, G. Moroni, T. Vaneker, G. Fadel, R.I. Campbell, I. Gibson, A. Bernard, J. Schulz, P. Graf, B. Ahuja and F. Martina, Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints, CIRP Annals (2016, Volume 65), p.737.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004

Google Scholar

[5] J.A. Dantzig and M. Rappaz. (2009, Solidification, 1st edn. Lausanne, Boca Raton, Fla.

Google Scholar

[6] W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (2014, Volume 23), p. (1917).

Google Scholar

[7] W.J. Sames, F.A. List, S. Pannala, R.R. Dehoff and S.S. Babu, The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing, International Materials Reviews (2016, Volume 61), p.315.

DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649

Google Scholar

[8] R. Gradinger, Herausforderungen bei der industriellen Umsetzung des Legierungskonzeptes Scalmalloy für Flugzeuganwendungen, BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte (2009, Volume 154), p.403.

DOI: 10.1007/s00501-009-0497-3

Google Scholar

[9] G.G. Gnesin, Metals and Alloys of the Bronze Age: from Middle to Modern Times. I. Copper and its Alloys, Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics (2015, Volume 53), p.610.

DOI: 10.1007/s11106-015-9657-z

Google Scholar

[10] J.T. Staley. (1989, Aluminum alloys - contemporary research and applications, 1st edn. Boston.

Google Scholar

[11] W. Meiners. (1999, Direktes selektives Laser Sintern einkomponentiger metallischer Werkstoffe.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Goodridge and S. Ziegelmeier, Powder bed fusion of polymers, (), p.181.

Google Scholar

[13] P.A. Hooper, Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing (2018, Volume 22), p.548.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032

Google Scholar

[14] N. Pirch, S. Linnenbrink, A. Gasser, K. Wissenbach and R. Poprawe, Analysis of track formation during laser metal deposition, Journal of Laser Applications (2017, Volume 29), p.22506.

DOI: 10.2351/1.4983231

Google Scholar

[15] T. Schopphoven, A. Gasser and G. Backes, EHLA: Extreme High-Speed Laser Material Deposition, Laser Technik Journal (2017, Volume 14), p.26.

DOI: 10.1002/latj.201700020

Google Scholar

[16] T. Schopphoven, A. Gasser, K. Wissenbach and R. Poprawe, Investigations on ultra-high-speed laser material deposition as alternative for hard chrome plating and thermal spraying, Journal of Laser Applications (2016, Volume 28), p.22501.

DOI: 10.2351/1.4943910

Google Scholar

[17] S. Ewald, F. Kies, S. Hermsen, M. Voshage, C. Haase and J.H. Schleifenbaum, Rapid Alloy Development of Extremely High-Alloyed Metals Using Powder Blends in Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Materials (Basel, Switzerland) (2019, Volume 12), p.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12101706

Google Scholar

[18] F. Kies, P. Köhnen, M.B. Wilms, F. Brasche, K.G. Pradeep, A. Schwedt, S. Richter, A. Weisheit, J.H. Schleifenbaum and C. Haase, Design of high-manganese steels for additive manufacturing applications with energy-absorption functionality, Materials & Design (2018, Volume 160), p.1250.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.051

Google Scholar

[19] C. Haase, F. Tang, M.B. Wilms, A. Weisheit and B. Hallstedt, Combining thermodynamic modeling and 3D printing of elemental powder blends for high-throughput investigation of high-entropy alloys – Towards rapid alloy screening and design, Materials Science and Engineering: A (2017, Volume 688), p.180.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.099

Google Scholar

[20] M. Awd, J. Tenkamp, M. Hirtler, S. Siddique, M. Bambach and F. Walther, Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Scalmalloy® Produced by Selective Laser Melting and Laser Metal Deposition, Materials (Basel, Switzerland) (2017, Volume 11), p.

DOI: 10.3390/ma11010017

Google Scholar

[21] G. Marchese, X. Garmendia Colera, F. Calignano, M. Lorusso, S. Biamino, P. Minetola and D. Manfredi, Characterization and Comparison of Inconel 625 Processed by Selective Laser Melting and Laser Metal Deposition, Advanced Engineering Materials (2017, Volume 19), p.1600635.

DOI: 10.1002/adem.201600635

Google Scholar

[22] A. Gebhardt. (2007, Generative Fertigungsverfahren, 3rd edn. München.

Google Scholar

[23] G. Rolink. (2016, Entwicklung der laserbasierten additiven Fertigung für intermetallische Fe-Al-Legierungen.

Google Scholar

[24] C.Y. Yap, C.K. Chua, Z.L. Dong, Z.H. Liu, D.Q. Zhang, L.E. Loh and S.L. Sing, Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications, Applied Physics Reviews (2015, Volume 2), p.41101.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4935926

Google Scholar

[25] R.J. Hebert, Viewpoint: metallurgical aspects of powder bed metal additive manufacturing, Journal of Materials Science (2016, Volume 51), p.1165.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-015-9479-x

Google Scholar

[26] S. Berumen, F. Bechmann, S. Lindner, J.-P. Kruth and T. Craeghs, Quality control of laser- and powder bed-based Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies, Physics Procedia (2010, Volume 5), p.617.

DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.089

Google Scholar

[27] H. Schleifenbaum, W. Meiners, K. Wissenbach and C. Hinke, Individualized production by means of high power Selective Laser Melting, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology (2010, Volume 2), p.161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.005

Google Scholar

[28] M. Voshage, P. Wen, M. Schaukellis and J.H. Schleifenbaum, Formation Quality, Mechanical Properties, and Processing Behavior of Pure Zinc Parts Produced by Laser-Based Manufacturing for Biodegradable Implants, BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte (2019, Volume 164), p.133.

DOI: 10.1007/s00501-019-0829-x

Google Scholar

[29] C.Y. Yap, C.K. Chua, Z.L. Dong, Z.H. Liu, D.Q. Zhang, L.E. Loh and S.L. Sing, Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications, Applied Physics Reviews (2015, Volume 2), p.41101.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4935926

Google Scholar

[30] C. Zhong, N. Pirch, A. Gasser, R. Poprawe and J. Schleifenbaum, The Influence of the Powder Stream on High-Deposition-Rate Laser Metal Deposition with Inconel 718, Metals (2017, Volume 7), p.443.

DOI: 10.3390/met7100443

Google Scholar