A Classification Review on Green Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is a short review of green concrete as claimed per latest related available literature. Green concrete refers to concrete mixture with lower carbon footprint, during its total life cycle, as compared to ordinary concrete mixture. This may be due to its composition of one or more green component (s) such as silica fume or fly ash, or to its capacity, as a building material, to reduce one or more pollutant (s) and/or to any other sustainable concrete procedure such as reduced raw materials depletion. A leading Italian concrete production group claims the provision of a new air scrubbing green concrete combining all of the above techniques. The claimed air scrubbing is based on a photocatalytic principle whereby natural or artificial light activates an oxidation process converting noxious pollutants into harmless compounds. Green concrete promotes sustainability in a creative way; thus, improving global human health.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-123

Citation:

Online since:

September 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on https://www.who.int/news-room/air-pollution#:~:text=Air%20pollution%20levels%20remain%20dangerously,from%20exposure%20to%20polluted%20air. [accessed on 16 February 2021].

Google Scholar

[2] Information on https://worldgbc.org/clean-air-buildings/impacts. [accessed on 16 February 2021].

Google Scholar

[3] Information on https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/greenhousegases/#:~:text=Greenhouse%20gases%20have%20far%2Dranging,change%20caused%20by%20greenhouse%20gases. [accessed on 16 February 2021].

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kajaste, M. Hurme, Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions – management options and abatement cost, J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 4041-4052.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055

Google Scholar

[5] A. Naqi, G. Jang, Recent progress in green cement technology utilizing low-carbon emission fuels and raw materials: a review, Sustainability. 11(2) (2019) 537.

DOI: 10.3390/su11020537

Google Scholar

[6] A. Petek Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, A. Stadel, Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review, Cem. Concr. Compos. 51 (2014) 38-48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005

Google Scholar

[7] Information on https://www.astm.org/Standard/interests/cement-and-concrete-standards [accessed on 16 February 2021].

Google Scholar

[8] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), Standard terminology related to concrete and concrete aggregates. Active Standard ASTM C125 -20 (2021) 2-4. Pennsylvania. United States.

Google Scholar

[9] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), Standard specification for concrete aggregates. Active Standard ASTM C33/C33M-18. (2021) Pennsylvania. United States.

Google Scholar

[10] Information on https://theconstructor.org/concrete/ [accessed on 16 February 2021].

Google Scholar

[11] B. Chattopadhyay, Portland Cement, in: M. S. Liew, P. Nguyen-Tri, T. A. Nguyen, S. Kakooei (Eds.), Micro and Nano Technologies, Smart Nanoconcretes and Cement-Based Materials, Elsevier, 2020, pp.461-483.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817854-6.00001-5

Google Scholar

[12] BSI (British Standards Institution) Standards Publications, Cement, Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, BS EN 197-1:2011. Incorporating corrigenda November 2011, October 2015 and February 2019 (2019) 9-10. London. U.K.

Google Scholar

[13] Aïtcin P.-C., 3 - Portland cement, in: Aïtcin P.-C., & Flatt R. (Eds.), Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures, Woodhead Publishing, 2016, 27-51.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100693-1.00003-5

Google Scholar

[14] Van Oss, H.G., Padovani, A.C., Cement manufacture and the environment, Part II: Environmental challenges and opportunities, J. Ind. Ecol. 7(1) (2003) 93–126.

DOI: 10.1162/108819803766729212

Google Scholar

[15] BSI (British Standards Institution) Standards Publications, Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures – Part 8: environmental labels and declarations, BS ISO 13315-8:2019 (E) (2019) 5-12. London. U.K.

Google Scholar

[16] Information on https://www.cement.org/cement-concrete/how-concrete-is-made [accessed on 3 April 2021].

Google Scholar

[17] H. Naderpour, M. Mirrashid, Estimating the compressive strength of eco-friendly concrete incorporating recycled coarse aggregate using neuro-fuzzy approach, J. Clean. Prod. 265 (2020) 121886.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121886

Google Scholar

[18] Information on https://www.ccaa.com.au/imis_prod/documents/Library%20Documents/ CCAA%20Reports/RecycledWater.pdf [accessed on 15 May 2021].

Google Scholar

[19] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), Standard specification for slag cement for use in concrete and mortars. Active Standard ASTM C989/C989M -18a. (2021) Pennsylvania. United States.

DOI: 10.14359/51663250

Google Scholar

[20] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Active Standard ASTM C618 - 19. (2019) Pennsylvania. United States.

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-00

Google Scholar

[21] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), Standard specification for silica fume used in cementitious mixtures. Active Standard ASTM C1240-20. (2020) Pennsylvania. United States.

Google Scholar

[22] R.B. Holland, K.E. Kurtis, L.F. Kahn, Supplementary cementitious material in waste and in Concrete, 7-Effect of different concrete materials on the corrosion of the embedded reinforcing steel, in: A. Poursaee (Eds.), Corrosion of Steel in Concrete Structures, Woodhead Publishing, 2016, pp.131-147.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-78242-381-2.00007-9

Google Scholar

[23] K.M. Liew, A.O. Sojobi, L.W. Zhang, Review - Green concrete: prospects and challenges, Constr. Build. Mater. 156 (2017) 1063-1095.

Google Scholar

[24] O. A. Cuzman, L. Wittig, F. J. Royo Abancéns, C. Herrera, N. R. Anastasi, and L. Sánchez Alonso, Bacterial masons, at workwith wastes for producing eco-cement, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 6 (10) (2015) 767.

DOI: 10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.696

Google Scholar

[25] K. Yu, W. McGee, T.Y. Ng, H. Zhu, V.C. Li, 3D-printable engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECC): Fresh and hardened properties, Cem. and Concr. Res. 143 (2021) 106388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106388

Google Scholar

[26] Information on https://www.italcementi.it/it/txactive-principio-attivo [accessed on 15 May 2021].

Google Scholar

[27] GPI Global Product Innovation - HeidelbergCement Group, Photocatalytic communication kit: The role of photocatalytic cement-based products as sustainable solutions. Bergamo, (2020).

Google Scholar

[28] L. Yang, A. Hakki, F. Wang, D. Macphee, Photocatalyst efficiencies in concrete technology: The effect of photocatalyst placement. Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 222 (2018) 200-208.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.013

Google Scholar

[29] M. Wimala, A. Fujiki, K. Kawai, Environmental impact of waste concrete treatment in precast concrete production, Conference Paper, Japan, (2011).

Google Scholar

[30] M.J. McCarthy, T.D. Dyer, Pozzolanas and pozzolanic materials, in: P. Hewlett, M. Liska (Eds), Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, fifth ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019, pp.363-467.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100773-0.00009-5

Google Scholar

[31] A. Tsiligiannis, C. Tsiliyannis, Renewable energy in cement manufacturing: A quantitative assessment of energy and environmental efficiency of food residue biofuels. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 107 (2019) 568-586.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.009

Google Scholar

[32] Z. Xiaoyi, W. Dongling, Z. Yuming, K. B. Manokaran, A. Benny Antony, IoT driven framework based efficient green energy management in smart cities using multi-objective distributed dispatching algorithm. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 88 (2021) 106567.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106567

Google Scholar