Experimental Determination of Tensile Stress Concentration Factors of 3D-Printed PLA Polymers: Fillet Radius, Hole Diameter, and Infill Density

Abstract:

3D-printing technology is being used as a regular approach in prototyping and the production of machine components. However, despite their metallic counterparts, there are many issues including infill pattern, density, and stress concentration coefficient in 3D printing that are not well-defined. The infill density plays a significant role in the printing time and mechanical properties of the printed objects. On the other hand, like metallic materials, changing geometry, such as fillet radius and hole alters the strength of the printed elements. In this work, experimental works have been conducted to determine the effect of infill density on the tensile strength of 3D printed elements. Furthermore, various standard specimens for tensile testing have been prepared to investigate the effects of fillet radius and in-plane hole diameters on the tensile strength of PLA 3D-printed elements with different infill density. Using the experimental results, the tensile stress concentration coefficients as a function of fillet radius, hole diameters, and infill density have been determined. The results of the present work can be used as a guideline for analytical design and manufacturing 3D printing objects.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1180)
• Pages: 13-22
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-9hYd0a
• Online since: August 2024
• Authors: Abolghassem Zabihollah*, Stephen Bardowell, Bryan Does, Rajesh Vuddandam
• Keywords: 3D Printing, Experimental, Fillet, Hole, PLA, Stress Concentration Factor, Tensile Strength

References

[1] Lubombo C. and Huneault M.A. Effect of infill patterns on the mechanical performance of lightweight 3d-printed cellular pla parts. Materials Today Communications, 17:214 – 228, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.09.017

[2] M Hlinka. Non-destructive Testing for the Influence of Infill Pattern Geometry on Mechanical Stiffness of 3D Printing Materials. PhD thesis, Florida Atlantic University, 2022.

[3] Sivasankaran S. Mustafa A. Aloyaydi, B. Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3d printed poly-lactic-acid. Polymer Testing, 87:106557, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557

[4] Kumar S.D. Magarajan U. Rajkumar S. Arulmurugan B. Sharma S. Li C. Ilyas R.A. Badran M.F. Ganeshkumar, S. Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3d printed polylactic- acid. Materials, 15:5142, 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15155142

[5] R. Srinivasan, W. Ruban, A. Deepanraj, R. Bhuvanesh, and T. Bhuvanesh. Effect on infill density on mechanical properties of petg part fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27:1838–1842, 2020. First International conference on Advanced Lightweight Materials and Structures.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.797

[6] Jesús Miguel Chacón, Miguel Angel Caminero, Eustaquio García-Plaza, and Pedro José Núñez. Additive manufacturing of pla structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Materials & Design, 124:143–157, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

[7] Zaveri N. Parab, S. Investigating the influence of infill pattern on the compressive strength of fused deposition modelled pla parts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, pages 239–247, 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4485-9_25

[8] Nagendra G. Tanikella, Ben Wittbrodt, and Joshua M. Pearce. Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3d printing. Additive Manufacturing, 15:40–47, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.005

[9] Sama S.R. Lynch P.C. Manogharan G. Wang, J. Design and topology optimization of 3d-printed wax patterns for rapid investment casting. Procedia manufacturing, 34:683–694, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.224

[10] Wang L. Ma G. Li, Z. Mechanical improvement of continuous steel microcable reinforced geopolymer composites for 3d printing subjected to different loading conditions. Procedia manufacturing, 187:107796, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107796

[11] Y.S. Kumar, S.A. Narayan. Tensile testing and evaluation of 3d-printed pla specimens as per astm d638 type iv standard. In Innovative Design, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering (I-DAD, pages 79–95, 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2718-6_9

[12] S. Kain, Josef Valentin Ecker, Andreas Haider, Mauricio Musso, and Alexander Petutschnigg. Effects of the infill pattern on mechanical properties of fused layer modeling (flm) 3d printed wood/polylactic acid (pla) composites. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78:65–74, 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/s00107-019-01473-0

[13] Malik B. Sharma P. Singh A. Chalisgaonkar R. Investigation Maurya, S. Investigation of different parameters of cube printed using pla by fdm 3d printer. Materials Today: Proceedings, pages 1–6, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.700

[14] Li Y. Song W. Yee K. Lee K.Y. Tagarielli V.L. Song, Y. Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3d-printed pla. Materials & Design: Proceedings, 123:154–164, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051

[15] J.H. Díaz-Aguilera H.R. Acevedo-Parra Fidencio Tapia SS.L. Rodríguez-Reyna, Cristian Mata. Mechanical properties optimization for pla, abs and nylon + cf manufactured by 3d fdm printing. Materials today Communications, 33:104774, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104774

[16] Ana M. Ferreira-Luke Dixon Kenny Dalgarno Natacha Rodrigues, Matthew Benning. Manufacture and characterization of porous pla scaffolds. Procedia CIRP, 49:33–38, 2016.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.025

[17] Astm d 638-22 standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, 2022.

[18] Raymond J. Roark and Warren C. Young. Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain. McGraw- Hill Education, 8 edition, 2011.