Role of Material Properties in Improving Sheet Formability in SPIF Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Single point incremental forming (SPIF) is a novel sheet metal forming process. Owing to unique deformation mechanism, this process improves the sheet formability as compared to the conventional stamping process. In the current paper, the mechanical properties and spifability (i.e. formability in SPIF) of a wide range of materials were tested. The mechanical properties were mainly determined through tensile testing and the spifability was evaluated using Varying Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) test. Each mechanical property was drawn against the improvement in sheet formability (i.e. difference of spifability and stampability) and the sole most influential property was identified. It was found that the improvement in formability increases with the increasing of true thickness strain at tensile fracture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 139-141)

Pages:

600-604

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Matsubara: Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engrg. Manuf. Vol. 215 (2009), pp.359-364.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Leach, A.J. Green and A.N. Bramley, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sheet Metal, Leuven (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kleiner, R. Kolleck, J. Rauer and T. Weinder: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 103 (2000), pp.109-113.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Amino, Y. Lu , S. Ozawa, K. Fukuda and T. Maki, in: Proceedings of the Conference onAdvanced Techniques of Plasticity (2002), pp.1015-1020.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Ambrogio, L. De. Napoli, L. Filice, F. Gagliardi and M. Muzzupappa: J. Mater. Process. Technol. 162-163 (2005), pp.156-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148

Google Scholar

[6] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramely, J. Duflou and J. Allwood: CIRP Ann. Vol. 54/2 (2005), pp.501-507.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

Google Scholar

[7] M.S. Shim and J.J. Park: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 113 (2001), pp.654-658.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Filice, L. Fratini and F. Micari: CIRP Ann. Vol. 51(1) (2002), pp.199-202.

Google Scholar

[9] G. Hussain and L. Gao: Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. Vol. 47 (2007), pp.419-435.

Google Scholar

[10] Y.H. Kim and J.J. Park: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 130-131 (2002), pp.42-46.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Hussain, L. Gao and N. Hayat: Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engrg. Manuf. Vol. 223 (2009), pp.73-81.

Google Scholar

[12] L. Fratini, G. Ambrogio, R.D. Lorenzo, L. Filice and F. Micari: CIRP Ann. Vol. 53 (2004), pp.207-210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60680-5

Google Scholar

[13] G. Hussain, L. Gao and N. Hayat: J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009), pp.423-427.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Iseki and H. Kumon: J. JSTP. Vol. 35 (1994), pp.1336-1341.

Google Scholar

[15] K. Jackson and J. Allwood: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 209 (2009), pp.1158-1174.

Google Scholar