Fundamental Aspects of Stray Current Corrosion on Buried Pipeline

Abstract:

Stray current is one of the main reasons in pipeline failure. In pipeline design and maintenance, it is important to know the fundamentals influencing stray current corrosion. However, it is difficult to control stray currents because many factors can affect its inflow points, outflow points and current densities. Several fundamental aspects, such as soil resistivity, coating worn rate, buried depth and horizon distance have been studied in order to find useful information in pipeline design. The results show stray current can be influenced by soil resistivity, coating worn rate and buried depth. It is suitable to control stray current corrosion by increasing soil resistivity, buried depth, horizon distance and decreasing coating worn rate. However, there are boundary values in controlling stray current corrosion by increasing soil resistivity, buried depth and horizon distance. For example, in this laboratory study, the boundary horizon distance is 200mm.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 146-147)
• Pages: 70-74
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.146-147.70
• Online since: October 2010
• Authors: Qing Jun Zhu, Alin Cao, Zai Feng Wang, Ji Wen Song, Sheng Li Chen
• Keywords: Depth, Distance, Soil Resistivity, Stray Current Corrosion, Worn Rate

References

[1] Mitigation of alternating current and lightning effects on metallic structures and corrosion control systems. NACE Standard RP0177-(2000).

[2] B.S. Wyatt. Proceedings of the UMIST cathodic protection conference, U.K., 10-11 Februray 2003: p.1.

[3] Beranek D. A., Moy G., Aimone M., Unified facilities criteria (UFC). DRAFT UFC 3-570-06, 1 July, (2001).

[4] I. A. Metwally, H. M. Al-Mandhair, A. Gastli and Z. Nadir. Engineering Analysis with boundary elements, 2007, 31: p.485.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2006.11.003

[5] Jiang C. H., Yu W. L., Wu X. G., Hu S. W. and Song L. Pipeline technology and equipments, 2004(1): p.10.

[6] S. Srikanth, T. S. N. Sankaranarayanan, K. Gopalakrishna, B. R. V. Narasimahan, T. V. K. Das and S. K. Das. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2005, 12(4): p.634.

[7] F. C. Robles Hernandez, G. Plascencia and Kevin Koch. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2009, 16(1): p.281.

[8] I. A. Metwally, H. M. Al-Mandhari, A. Gastli and A. Al-Bimani. Engineering Analysis with boundary elements, 2008, 32(1): p.32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.06.003

[9] K. Zakowski and W. Sokolski. Corrosion Science, 1999, 41(11): p.2213.

[10] L. Bertolini, M. Carsana and P. Pedeferri. Corrosion Science, 2007, 49(3): p.1056.

[11] Zhao J. Y., Teng Y. P. and Liu L. L. Pipeline technology and equipments, 2007(2): p.38.