FEM Simulation of Multipass Shape Rolling Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The updating geometric method was proposed to simulate the deformation behavior of workpiece during multipass shape rolling by using finite element method. Firstly, establish and solve the finite element model of the first pass shape rolling process, then update the geometric shape of workpiece after the first pass and delete rolls of the first pass, establish and mesh rolls of the second pass, modify the boundaries and material parameters of workpiece, and solve its deformation behavior during the second pass shape rolling. With the same steps, its deformation behavior during the following passes rolling could be solved. The method was applied to simulate the deformation behavior of a cube workpiece during six-pass H-beam rolling with split-rolling, and its shapes after every pass rolling process were obtained. Experiments on the deformation behavior of slab during multipass rolling were carried out by using pure lead in an experimental mill. The calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental ones.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 148-149)

Pages:

1-6

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.Y. Kim, and Y.T. Im: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 127(1) (2002), p.57.

Google Scholar

[2] L.B. Wei, and Y. Zang: Iron Steel, 43(8) (2008), p.54.

Google Scholar

[3] X.H. Liu: Rigid plastic finite element method and its application in rolling process. (Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing1994. ).

Google Scholar

[4] K. Komori, and K. Koumura: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 105 (1) (2000), p.24.

Google Scholar

[5] G.M. Zhu, Y.L. Kang, W. Chen, and G.T. Ma: China Mech. Eng., Vol. 18(14) (2007), p.1747.

Google Scholar

[6] H.L. Zhang, Q.H. Zhang, F.Y. Meng, Y.M. Li, and J.H. Chen: Heavy Machinery, Vol. 5(2008), p.24.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Glowacki, Z. Kedzierski, H. Kusiak, W. Madej, and M. Pietrzyk: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 34(1992), p.509.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Komori: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 92-93(1999), p.450.

Google Scholar

[9] A.A. Milenin, H. Dyja, and S. Mróz: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 153-154(2004), p.108.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Glowacki: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 168(2005), p.336.

Google Scholar

[11] H.L. Yu, X.H. Liu, X.M. Zhao, and Y. Kusaba: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 180(1-3) (2006), p.323.

Google Scholar

[12] H.L. Yu, X.H. Liu, C.S. Li, F.F. Lan, and G.D. Wang: J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 209(6) (2009), p.2876.

Google Scholar

[13] Experimental report of 900×480H-Beam dog-bone shaped bloom rolling simulation with 1500×300 mm slab( Northeastern University, Shenyang, 2008).

Google Scholar