Transformation Induced Plasticity Behaviors of TRIP Steels with Different Heat Treatment Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two-stage heat treatment process which has guiding significance for continuous annealing TRIP steel producing was applied in this research. Different matrixes such as polygonal ferrite matrix, bainite ferrite matrix and annealed martenite matrix were obtained through different heat treatment processes. Compared the transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) behaviors of three different tested samples,and the corresponding process for required product properties can be chosen. It was found that the needle-like retained austenite obtained in AMT steel was isolated from other microstructures while the retained austenite in the other two samples appeared to be equiaxed or network structure. The elongation, yield ratio and stability of retained austenite in AMT steel were all higher than that in PFT or BFT steels. BFT steel possesses highest tensile strength and lowest elongation while the yield ratio, RA content and carbon concentration in RA were all lowest for PFT steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 150-151)

Pages:

118-122

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.S. Liu, Fazeli F, Militzer M: Metallurgical and Materials Transaction. Vol. 38A(2007), p.894~909.

Google Scholar

[2] T. De Cock, J.P. Ferrer: Scripta Materialia Vol. 55(2006), p.441~443.

Google Scholar

[3] Han Seong-ho, Seong Hwangoo: Met. Mater. Int., Vol. 15, 4(2009), p.521~529.

Google Scholar

[4] E.V. Pereloma, I.B. Timokhina, P.D. Materials Science and Engineering: Vol. A273~275(1999), p.448~452.

Google Scholar

[5] Masayoshi Sasaki, Kenichi Ohsasa: ISIJ International, Vol. 48 (2008), p.340~343.

Google Scholar

[6] Manuel Gomez, C. Isaac Garcia: ISIJ International, Vol. 49 (2009), p.302~311.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Zaefferer, J. Ohlert,W. Bleck: Acta Materialia. Vol. 52 (2004), p.2765~2778.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Hulka,W. Bleck, and K. Papamantellos: 41st MWSP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 37(1999), p.67~77.

Google Scholar

[9] M. De Meyer, D. Vanderschueren, and B. De Cooman: 41st MWSP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 37(1999), p.265~275.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Sakuma,D. K Matlock, and G. Krauss. Metallurgical: Transactions A, Vol. 23A(1992), p.1233~1241.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Sugimoto, N. Usui, M. Kobayashi: ISIJ Inter. Vol. 32 (1992), p.1311~1318.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Tomota,H. Tokuda,M. Wakita: Acta Materialia. Vol. 52(2004), p.5737~5745.

Google Scholar

[13] P.J. Jacques: Curr. Opinion Solid State Mater. Sci., Vol. 8(2004), p.259.

Google Scholar

[14] Sugimoto K, Nagasaka, Kobayashi and et al: ISIJ Int., Vol. 39(1999), p.56.

Google Scholar

[15] Sugimoto K, Kobayashi M and Hashimoto S: Metall. Trans. Vol. 23A (1992), p.3085.

Google Scholar

[16] Sugimoto K, Usui N, Kobayashi M, et al: ISIJ Int., Vol. 32(1992), p.1311.

Google Scholar