Structural Assessment of a 40 Year Old R.C. Building

Article Preview

Abstract:

A 6-story R.C. office building had a plan typical of a frame design, but a beam column design procedure was used. Working Stress Design method was used. Severe cracking ranging in size from 5 – 20 mm. A comprehensive study of the design drawings, site and laboratory testing was conducted on structural members to determine the cause and suggest the remedy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)

Pages:

1833-1836

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] The Egyptian Code for Design and construction of R.C. Buildings, (1969).

Google Scholar

[2] Evaluating Cracks in Concrete Walls, Bruce A. Suprenant and Kim D. Basham, Publication # C930016, The Aberdeen group, (1993).

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM D 2216-05, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass.

Google Scholar

[4] ASTM C 42-03, Standard Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete.

DOI: 10.1520/c0042_c0042m-12

Google Scholar

[5] ASTM C 617-03, Standard Method of Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.

Google Scholar

[6] Hand Book of Repair and Rehabilitation of RCC Building, Central Public Works Department, Government of India, (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Guidelines For The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication 273), (1997).

Google Scholar

[8] Repair and Retrofitting of Deteriorated Reinforced Concrete Structures – Three Case Studies, A.H. Al-Gadhib, M.H. Baluch and M.K. Rahman, The 6th Saudi Engineering Conference, Dhahran, December (2002).

Google Scholar