Ni Layer Evolution of FeCrAl Substrate Treated by Ultrasonic and Electroplating Methods in Long Term Oxidation at 900°C

Article Preview

Abstract:

The long term oxidation test of FeCrAl substrate treated by ultrasonic and electroplating methods was performed at 9000C in air environment for 100 hours. The purpose of this paper is to show the nickel layer evolution of that substrate. Oxide scale and layer evolution were assessed on specimens using scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The nickel layer disappeared and fully converted to be nickel oxide on FeCrAl treated using ultrasonic and nickel electroplating after oxidation exposure at 9000 C in air for 100 hours. In this condition, the nickel oxide still existed. Not only nickel oxide and Al2O3 were occurred when oxidation exposure at this condition but also Cr2O3 and Fe2O3. The lowest parabolic rate constant was obtained from FeCrAl ultrasonic treatment with SiC for 50 minutes at 1.21 x 10-4 mg2mm4h-1, and FeCrAl ultrasonic treatment with Al2O3 for 30 minutes at 1.15 x 10-4 mg2mm4h-1. The lower parabolic rate constant indicated the higher long time to failure of the FeCrAl substrate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 181-182)

Pages:

501-506

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Jedlinski: Solid State Ionics Vols. 101-103 (1997), pp.1033-1040.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Klöwer, A. Kolb-Telieps, H. Bode, M. Brede, J. Lange, R. Brück, L. Wieres: Development of high-temperature corrosion resistant FeCrAl alloys for automotive catalytic converters (Munich, Germany 1998).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Badini, F. Laurella: Surface and Coatings Technology Vols. 135 (2001), pp.291-298.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Engkvist, T.M. Grehk, U. Bexell, M. Olsson: Surface & Coatings Technology Vols. 203 (2009) p.2845–2850.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.128

Google Scholar

[5] R. Chegroune, E. Salhi, A. Crisci, Y. Wouters, A. Galerie: Oxid Met Vols. 70 (2008) pp.331-337.

DOI: 10.1007/s11085-008-9126-x

Google Scholar

[6] Q. Wei, Z. Chen, Z. Nie, Y. Hao, J. Zou, Z. Wang: Journal of Alloys and Compounds Vols. 396 (2005) p.283–287.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Cueff, H. Buscail, E. Caudron, F. Riffard, C. Issartel, S. El Messki: Applied Surface Science 229 (2004) p.233–241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.072

Google Scholar

[8] D. Sebayang, P. Untoro, Y. Putrasari, Y.H. Soon, M. Hashim, and M. Gomaa: Proceeding of Malaysian Metallurgical Conferences'09 (2009), pp.1-5.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Sebayang, P. Untoro, and Y. Putrasari: Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering AMME-14 (2010), MS – 5, pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Sebayang, Y. Putrasari, S. Hasan, and P. Untoro: Advanced Materials Research Vols. 129-131 (2010) pp.1262-1266.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Liangzhong, P. Chenghuang: Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Edition) Series B Vols. 2 No. 2 (1989) pp.133-137.

Google Scholar

[12] D. Lee, M.L. Santella, I.M. Anderson, G.M. Pharr: Metallurgical And Materials Transactions A Vols. 36A (2005) pp.1855-1869.

Google Scholar

[13] R. M. Heck, R. J. Farrauto, S.T. Gulati: Catalytic Air Pollution Control Commercial Technology 3rd ed (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey 2009), p.114.

Google Scholar

[14] Thyssen Krupp. VDM: Aluchrom Yhf Material Data Sheet No. 4049 (Germany: March 2008).

Google Scholar