A Study on the Oxidation Behavior of Nickel Coatings with Different Grain Sizes and Preferred Orientations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ni coatings with different grain sizes and preferred orientations were produced by the control of current density during a direct current electrodepositing process. The effects of grain size reduction and preferred orientation on the oxidation behavior in air at 600°C and 960°C of Ni coatings were investigated respectively. An important and interesting result is that after oxidation at 600°C, the Ni coating obtained at lower current density has a better oxidation resistance, whereas after oxidation at 960°C, the Ni coating obtained at higher current density has a more compact scale and a better oxidation resistance. For the Ni coatings oxidation at 600°C, the oxidation behavior was mainly influenced by grain size, whereas in the case of the Ni coatings oxidation at 960°C, the oxidation behavior was only slightly influenced by grain size. The changes in oxidation behavior of Ni coatings at 960°C can be attributed to the different preferred orientation and the corresponding oxidation mechanism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 183-185)

Pages:

1762-1766

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Atkinson, R.I. Taylor, P.D. Goode: Oxid. Met. Vol. 13 (1979), p.519.

Google Scholar

[2] A.M. Huntz, M. Andrieux, and R. Molin: Materials Science and Engineering: A Vol. 415 (2006), p.21.

Google Scholar

[3] M.J. Graham, G.I. Sproule, D. Caplan, M. Cohen: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 119 (1972), p.883.

Google Scholar

[4] R.K. Singh Raman, P.K. Gupta: Corrosion Sci. Vol. 51 (2009), p.316.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Rahamn, R. Jayaganthan, S. Praksh, V. Chawla, R. Chandra. J. Alloy. Compd. Vol. 472 (2009), p.478.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Ma, K.C. Zhou, Z.Y. Li: WEI Qiu-ping. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. Vol. 17 (2010), p.708.

Google Scholar

[7] K.C. Chan, W. K. Chan, N. S. Qu: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 89-90 (1999), p.447.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Li, H. Jiang, W. Huang, H. Tian: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 254 (2008), p.6865.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Wang, Y. Gao, T. Xu, Q. Xue: Materials Chemistry and Physics Vol. 99 (2006), p.96.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Sato, T. Minami, S. Takata, T. Yamada: Thin Solid Films Vol. 236 (1993), p.27.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Dubois, C. Monty, J. Philibert: Philosophical Magazine A Vol. 46 (1982), p.419.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Atkinson, R.I. Taylor: Philosophical Magazine A Vol. 43 (1981), p.979.

Google Scholar

[13] F. Czerwinski, W.W. Smeltzer: Microscopy of Oxidation-2, ed. (Trans Tech Publications, London 1993).

Google Scholar

[14] L.C. Dufour, F. Morin: Oxid. Met. Vol. 39 (1993), p.137.

Google Scholar

[15] C. Wamger: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 99 (1952), p.369.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Chevalier, F. Desserrey, J.P. Larpin: Oxid. Met. Vol. 64 (2005), p.219.

Google Scholar