Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution by Acid Treated Fungal Biomass

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biosorption of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solution with fungal biomass Penicillium sp. was investigated in the batch system. The influence of contact time, solution pH, biosorbent concentration, initial concentration of Cr (VI) ions and temperature on biosorption capacity of Cr (VI) ions was studied. The uptake of Cr (VI) was highly pH dependent and the optimum pH for biosorption of Cr (VI) ions was found to be 2.0. Biosorption capacity of Cr (VI) ions decreased with increased biosorbent concentration and increased with increase in initial concentration of Cr (VI) ions. The experiment results also showed that high temperatures increased the biosorption capacity of Cr (VI) by fungal biomass. It was found that the biosorption equilibrium data were fitted very well to the kangmuir as well as to the Freundlich adsorption model. The maximum sorptive capacities obtained from the Langmuir equation at temperature of 20, 30 and 40°C were 25.91, 32.68 and 35.97 mg/g for Cr (VI) ions, respectively. The results of this study indicated that the fungal biomass of Penicillium sp. is a promising biosorbent for removal of chromium (VI) ions from the water.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 197-198)

Pages:

131-135

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Ertugay and Y.K. Bayhan: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 154(2008), p.432.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Sari, D. Mendil, M. Tuzen and M. Soylak: Chemical Engineering Journal Vol. 144(2008), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Kaewsarn and Q. Yu: Environ. Pollut. Vol. 112(2001), p.209.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Selatnia, M.Z. Bakhti, A. Madani and Y. Mansouri: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 75(2004), p.11.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Dakiky, A. Khami and M. Mereb: Advances in Environmental Research Vol. 6(2002), p.533.

Google Scholar

[6] G.S. Agarwal, H.K. Bhuptawat and S. Chaudhari: Bioresource Technology Vol. 97(2006), p.949.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Park, Y.S. Yun, and J. M. Park: Process Biochem Vol. 40(2005), p.2559.

Google Scholar

[8] S.R. Bai and T.E. Abraham: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 87(2003), p.17.

Google Scholar

[9] B. Volesky and Z.R. Holan: Biotechnol. Prog. Vol. 11, p.235.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Kapoor and T. Viraraghavan: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 53(1995), p.195.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Kapoor, T. Viraraghvan, and D.R. Cullimore: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 70(1999), p.95.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Kumar, N.R. Bishnoi and K. Bishnoi: Chemical Engineering Journal Vol. 135(2008), p.202.

Google Scholar

[13] Z. Aksu: Process Biochem. Vol. 1(2002), p.1.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Ödemira, E. Kilinc and K. Güvena: Chemical Engineering Journal Vol. 152(2009), p.195.

Google Scholar

[15] S.R. Bai and T.E. Abraham: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 79(2001), p.73.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Mor, R. Khaiwal and N.R. Bishnoi: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 8(2006), p.954.

Google Scholar

[17] R.L. Ramos, A.J. Martinez and R. M. G. Coronado: Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 30(1994), p.191.

Google Scholar

[18] C. Green-Ruiz, V.R. Tirado and B.G. Gil: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 99(2008), p.3864.

Google Scholar

[19] D.C. Sharma and C.F. Forster: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 47(1994), p.257.

Google Scholar

[20] S.Y. Kang, J. U. Lee and K. W. Kima: Biochemical Engineering Journal Vol. 36(2007), p.54.

Google Scholar