Pollution Assessment of Luanhe–Beidaihe Estuary by Eutrophication Index and Biodiversity Index

Article Preview

Abstract:

Several pollution assessment indexes were applied in the pollution evaluation of Luanhe-Beidaihe Estuary. The results of evaluation by single diversity index of phytoplankton (DIP), diversity index of zooplankton (DIZ), and diversity index of macrobenthos (DIM) showed that the environment of seven sections were all not severe polluted. Otherwise, the results of evaluation by eutrophication index (E. I.) showed that six sections (section A, B, C, D, E, and F) were in the level of eutrophication, only section G was in the level of mesotrophy. Pollution assessment by E. I. was more appropriate than biodiversity index, according to the fact of ‘red tide’occurrence in August 2009. It was suggested that the comprehensive pollution index, considering both of the response of pullution and the cause of pollution simultaneously, should be developed to reduce the the discrepancy resulted from the pollution assessment by singular index.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 197-198)

Pages:

962-966

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Karydis, L. Ignatiades and N. Moschopoulou: Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. Vol. 16 (1983), p.339.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Moriki and M. Karydis: Environ. Monit. Assess. Vol. 33 (1994), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] D. M. Linton and G. F. Warner: Ocean Coast. Manage. Vol. 46 (2003), p.261.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Elżbieta: Teka Kom. Ochr. Kszt. Środ. Prayr. Vol. 1 (2004), p.316.

Google Scholar

[5] V. Alexandrova, S. Moncheva, N. Slabakova, K. Stefanova and V. Doncheva: Transit. Waters Bull. Vol. 3 ( 2007), p.17.

Google Scholar

[6] N. T. Chellappa, F. R. A. Câmara and O. Rocha: Braz. J. Bio. Vol. 69 (2009), p.241.

Google Scholar

[7] I. Primpas, G. Tsirtsis, M. Karydis and G. Kokkoris: Ecol. indicators Vol. 10 (2010), p.178.

Google Scholar

[8] N. T. Chellappa, F. R. A. Câmara and O. Rocha: Braz. J. Bio. Vol. 69 (2009), p.241.

Google Scholar

[9] G. He, Y. Lu, H. Ma and X. Wang: J. Environ. Sci. Vol. 19 (2007), p.494.

Google Scholar

[10] C. E. Shannon and W. Wiener: The mathematical theory of communication (University of Illinois Press, Illinois (1963).

Google Scholar

[11] X. L. Gao and J. M. Song: Mar. Pollut. Bull. Vol. 50 (2005), p.327.

Google Scholar

[12] D. M. Stevens: J. Marine Res. Vol. 24 (1966), p.113.

Google Scholar

[13] B. A. Wade: Mar. Pollut. Bull. Vol. 2 (1971), p.1.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Karydis: Global NEST J. Vol. 11 (2009), p.373.

Google Scholar