Dilution of Position Calculation for Accuracy Improvement in Wireless Location Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

Geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) represents the geometric effect on the relationship between measurement error and positioning determination error. In the calculation of GDOP value, the maximum volume method does not guarantee the optimal selection of the four measurement units. The conventional method for calculating GDOP is to use matrix inversion to all subsets. In this paper, we employ GDOP using the matrix inversion method to select appropriate base stations (BSs) in cellular communication systems. The proposed BS selection criterion performs better than the random subsets of four or five BSs chosen from all seven BSs. The performances of MS location strongly depend on the relative position of the MS and BSs. Therefore, it is very important to select a subset with the most appropriate BSs rapidly and reasonably before positioning.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 204-210)

Pages:

1036-1040

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. D. Kaplan and C. J. Hegarty, Understanding GPS: principles and applications (2nd Ed),. Artech House Press, Boston, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Hsu, Relations between Dilutions of Performance and Volume of the Tetrahedron Formed by Four Satellites, IEEE PLANS, (1994), pp.669-676.

DOI: 10.1109/plans.1994.303375

Google Scholar

[3] W. Parkinson and U. Spilker, Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, New York: AIAA Press, (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] W. H. Foy, Position-location solutions by Taylor series estimation, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. AES-12, no. 2, Mar. (1976), pp.187-194.

DOI: 10.1109/taes.1976.308294

Google Scholar

[5] D. J. Torrieri, Statistical theory of passive location systems, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. AES-20, no. 2, Mar. (1984), pp.183-198.

DOI: 10.1109/taes.1984.310439

Google Scholar

[6] J. Caffery, A new approach to the geometry of TOA location, in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., Sep. (2000), p.1943-(1949).

Google Scholar

[7] C. -S. Chen, S. -S. Su, and Y. -F. Huang, Hybrid TOA/AOA geometrical positioning schemes for mobile location, IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E92-B, no 2, Feb. (2009), pp.396-402.

DOI: 10.1587/transcom.e92.b.396

Google Scholar

[8] L. Cong and W. Zhuang, Nonline-of-Sight Error Mitigation in Mobile Location, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. (2005), pp.560-573.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2004.843040

Google Scholar

[9] S. Venkatraman, J. Caffery, and H. -R. You, A novel TOA location algorithm using LOS range estimation for NLOS environments, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 53, Sep. (2004), pp.1515-1524.

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2004.832384

Google Scholar