Factors Influencing Bonding Strength of Geopolymer-Aggregate Interfacial Transition Zone

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fundamental studies on geopolymer are increased rapidly because of its potential commercial applications. However, little work has been done on the relationship of the interfacial transitional zone between geopolymer and aggregate and its influence on the final chemical and physical properties of geopolymeric products derived from waste materials. In this paper, factors that influencing the interfacial transition zone of geopolymer concrete such as the type of the aggregate and the oxide compositions of raw materials was studied. The microstructure was also observed through relative devices. The presented results show that bonding strength of geopolymer-marble interfacial transitional zone, of which the 28d bonding strength reached up to 7.9 MPa, was higher than that of geopolymer-granite. The bonding strength of geopolymer-marble/geopolymer-granite interfacial transitional zone increased and finally reached up to 7.9 MPa/4.3 MPa with the molar ratio of n(SiO2)/n(Al2O3) increased within the range of 2.6~2.9. Both geopolymer-marble and geopolymer-granite bonding strength decreased as the molar ratio of n(SiO2)/ n(Na2O) increased. The mechanical properties of interfacial transitional zone between geopolymer and stone were affected by the oxide component of the geopolymer and the type of the raw materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-7

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Wang and H.W. Ma: A Study of The Formation Process of the Geopolymer gel[J]. Acta Petrologica Et Mineralogica, 2005, 24(2), pp.133-138.

Google Scholar

[2] J.S.J. Van Deventer, J.L. Provis and P. Duxson: Reaction Mechanisms in the Geopolymeric Conversion of Inorganic Waste to Useful Products[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 139, p.506–513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.044

Google Scholar

[3] V.M. Malhotra and P.K. Mehta: High-Performance, High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete for Building Sustainable and Durable Structures[M]. Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Development Inc, Ottawa, Canada (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Davidovits and M. Davidovics. Geopolymer Room Temperature Ceramic Matrix for Composites[J]. Ceram Eng Sci Proc, 1988, 9, pp.835-842.

Google Scholar

[5] A.J. Foden, P. Balaguru and R.E. Lyon: Mechanical Properties and Fire Response of Geopolymer Structural Composites[J]. Int SAMPE Symp Exhib, 1996(41), pp.748-758.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Bakharev: Durability of Geopolymer Materials in Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Solutions[J]. CemConcr Res, 2005(35), p.1233–1246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002

Google Scholar

[7] Y.S. Zhang, W. Sun and L. Zhang: In Situ Quantitatively Tracking the Hydration Process of Interfacecial Transition Zone Between Coarse Aggregate and K-PSDS Geopolymer Matrix With ESEM[J]. Journal of The Chinese Ceramic Society, 2003(31), pp.806-810.

Google Scholar

[8] L.Q. Weng, Sagoe-Cren Tsil Kwesi and S.H. Song. Hydrolysis Kinetics of Aluminates in Geopolyers Synthesis[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2005, 33(3), pp.276-280.

Google Scholar

[9] H.F.W. Taylor: Chemistry of Cement Hydration. Proc 8th Int Congress in the Chemistry of Cement, 1986(1), pp.82-110 .

Google Scholar

[10] M. Luz Granizo M.T. Blanco-Varela and S. Martı´nez-Ramı´rez: Alkali Activation of Metakaolins-Parameters Affecting Mechanical, Structural and Microstructural Properties[J]. J Mater Sci, 2007(42), p.2934–2943.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0565-y

Google Scholar

[11] H. Xu and J.S.J. Van Deventer: Microstructural Characterization of Geopolymers Synthesized from Kaolinite/stilbite Mixtures Using XRD, MAS-NMR, SEM/ED, 2002(32), pp.1705-1716

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00859-1

Google Scholar

[12] William K. Lee. Solid–Gel Interactions in Geopolymers[D]. The University of Melbourne, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2002, pp.147-148.

Google Scholar

[13] J.W. Phair and J.S.J. Van Deventer. Effect of Silicate Activator pH on The Leaching and Material Characteristics of Waste-based Inorganic Polymers[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2001(14), pp.289-304.

DOI: 10.1016/s0892-6875(01)00002-4

Google Scholar

[14] A.Q. Wang and C.Z. Zhang: Formation Mechanism and Methods of Improvement of Interfacecial Transition Zone between Cement Paste and Aggregate[J]. Concrete and Cement Products, 1994, pp.18-20.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Xu and J.S.J. Van Deventer: The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate Minerals[J]. Int J Miner Process, 2000(59), pp.247-266.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(99)00074-5

Google Scholar

[16] W.K.W. Lee and J.S.J. van Deventer: The Interface between Natural Siliceous Aggregates and Geopolymers[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2004(34), pp.195-206.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00250-3

Google Scholar

[17] L. Chen, Z.H. Zheng, H.Q. Shao and Fan Pengyun: Research on Asymmetry of Interfacial Transition Zone in Concrete[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2007(29), pp.111-114.

Google Scholar

[18] Y.L. Zhao: Study on the Formation of Cementitious Material and Mechanism of Hydration by Water Glass Activation of Fine Slag[D]. Xi An University of Architecture and Technology, 2007, pp.26-29.

Google Scholar