Review on Statistical Based Methods of Measuring the Water Pipes Reliability

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article attempts to provide a general review on the most widely used prediction modeling of pipes breakage and reliability. The intention of this review is to lay the historical improvement stages of this topic, to identify the previous challenges faced the researchers, to identify the malfunctions of the methods and techniques, and clarifying the limits of each technique. In addition, how the researchers could overcome the malfunctions and what are the deficiencies identified so that solutions can be suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 230-232)

Pages:

1327-1331

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shamir, U., and Howard, C.D.D. (1979) An analytic approach to scheduling pipe replacement. J. AWWA, 71(5), 248-258.

DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1979.tb04345.x

Google Scholar

[2] Kettler, A. J. & Goulter, I. C. (1985) An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 12 (2), 286–293. P 147–155.

DOI: 10.1139/l85-030

Google Scholar

[3] McMullen, L. D., (1982). Advanced Concepts in Soil Evaluation for Exterior Pipeline Corrosion, Proceeding AWWA Annual Conference, Miami.

Google Scholar

[4] Jacobs, P. & Karney, B. (1994) GIS development with application to cast iron water main brekage rates. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Water Pipeline Systems, Edinburgh. Mechanical Engineering Publication Ltd, London.

Google Scholar

[5] Andreou, S. A., Marks, D. H., and Clark, R. M. (1987). A new methodology for modeling break failure patterns in deteriorating water distribution systems: Theory., Advance in Water Resources, 10, 2-10.

DOI: 10.1016/0309-1708(87)90002-9

Google Scholar

[6] Andreou, S. A., Marks, D. H., and Clark, R. M. (1987). A new methodology for modeling break failure patterns in deteriorating water distribution systems: Applications., Advance in Water Resources, 10, 11-20.

DOI: 10.1016/0309-1708(87)90003-0

Google Scholar

[7] Malandain, J., Le Gauffre, P. and Miramond, M. (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] Kleiner , Y. and Rajani, B. B. (2010), I-WARP: Individual Water Main Renewal Planner, NRCC-53221, Drinking Water Engineering and Science Discussion, v. 3, pp.25-41, January 01, (2010).

DOI: 10.5194/dwes-3-71-2010

Google Scholar

[9] Davidson, J. W., and Goulter, I. C. (1994). A new probability distribution to model water main breakage patterns., Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Water Pipeline Systems, BHR Group Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland.

Google Scholar

[10] Goulter, I. C. & Kazemi, A. (1988) Spatial and temporal groupings of water main pipe breakage in Winnipeg. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (1), 91–97.

DOI: 10.1139/l88-010

Google Scholar

[11] Brémond, B., (1997). Statistical modeling as help in network renewal decision., European Commission Co-operation on Science and Technology (COST), Committee C3 – Diagnostics of Urban Infrastructure, Paris, France.

Google Scholar

[12] Lei, J. (1997). Statistical approach for describing lifetimes of water mains – Case Trondheim Municipality., SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Report No. 22F007. 28, Trondheim, Norway.

Google Scholar

[13] Quimpo, R. G., and U. M. Shamsi, (1991), Reliability Based Distribution System Maintenance, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 117, 3, pp.321-339, May/June.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1991)117:3(321)

Google Scholar

[14] Mofid Gorji-Bandpy and Tahereh Gorji-Bandpy, (2007), Analysis of Pipe Breaks in Urban Water Distribution Network - Three Case Studies in Iran, International Conference on Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities for GMS 12-14.

Google Scholar

[15] Park S. (2008) Identifying the hazard characteristics of pipes in water distribution systems by using the proportional hazards model: theory. KSCE J Civil Engineering 8(6): 663–668.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02823557

Google Scholar