Pulse Electrochemical Polishing of 304 Stainless Steel: Interactive Effects of Bath Temperature, Pulse Duty Ratio, Polishing Time, and Current Density on Surface Reflectivity and Morphology

Article Preview

Abstract:

304 stainless steel is deemed an indispensable material in the industry. In many instances, the surface of the production equipment needs to be treated for low-corrosion passivation, lower surface roughness, good degree of finish and cleanliness. The process characteristics of pulse electrochemical polishing meet these requirements well. The current study investigates the effects of the major processing parameters on the surface reflectivity and the surface metallography. The electrolyte with 29.4% water content and a ratio between H2SO4 and H3PO4 of 2 and 4 has been proven to be successful, showing no corrosion pitting points on the specimen surface. The electrolyte temperature of 50~55°C, the pulse duty ratio of 33~50% and the electrical current density of 50 to 55A/dm2 are found to be optimal. The addition of 2.4% glycerin and 2.2% glucose provides a very fine surface, surface reflectivity of stainless steel from 18% improve 89%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 233-235)

Pages:

985-989

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. ES, Park JW, Moon YH Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20 (2002):720–726

Google Scholar

[2] L.ES, Park JW, Moon YH .Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2(1) (2001):18–25

Google Scholar

[3] K.P .Rajurkar, B. Wei, J .Kozak ,Ann CIRP 42(1) (1993):231–234

Google Scholar

[4] R Schuster, V. Kirchner, Science 289(2000):98–101

Google Scholar

[5] F. Tailoka, D.J. Fray, Trans. Inst. Miner. Met. Sec. C 102(1993) 1.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Reisener, M.A. Reuter, J. Kruger, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48(1993) 1089.

Google Scholar

[7] S.A. Amadi, D.R. Gabe, M.R. Goodenough, Trans. I.M.F 77(1994) 66.

Google Scholar

[8] A.Y. Hosny, T.J. O'Keefe, J.W. Johnson, W.J. James, J. Appl.Electrochem. 22 (1992) 596.

Google Scholar

[9] L .Xiaowei, J. Zhixin, Z. Jiaqi, L. Jinchun ,J Mater Process Technol 71(1997):373–376

Google Scholar

[10] P.Jeong Woo , L.Deug Woo Manuf Technol 40(2009) 742–748

Google Scholar

[11] M.G. Kang, N.G. Park, K.S. Ryu, et. At., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90 (2006) 574.

Google Scholar

[12] H.G. Yun, Y.S. Jun, J.D. Kim, et. Al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 133311.

Google Scholar

[13] C.C. Lin and C.C. Hu, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 3356.

Google Scholar

[14] L, Eun-Sang. London , Springer-Verlag , Acta 16(2000) 591-599

Google Scholar

[15] C. Wang and S. Chen, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 66 (7) (2001) 477–481.

Google Scholar

[16] C.L. Liu, P.K. Chu, G.Q. Lin and M. Qi, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (2006) 2802–2806.

Google Scholar