Influencing Factors of Phytic Acid Conversion Coating on AZ91 Magnesium Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

AZ91 magnesium alloy is selected as the matrix metal. SEM, EDS, Tafel and EIS were adopted and spot test was carried out to investigate the influence of pH value, phytic acid concentration, temperature,conversion time on corrosion resistance of conversion coatings. Result shows that process of phytic acid forming is the controlled metal corrosion process and the uneven surface pattern reflects the different chemical properties of two-phase current on magnesium alloy surface, which is implied by the conversion surface. It is proved by the test that pH value is committed the most to the corrosion resistance of the conversion coating, and the next is the phytic acid concentration. It is found that the corrosion resistance of the conversion coating is the best when pH value of the conversion solution is 4.5; The conversion coating has little influence on the cathode reaction dynamics, however, more importantly, it changes the dynamics of the alloy electrode anode solution reaction, therefore, the alloy’s anode current density decreases while the corrosion resistance of magnesium alloy is enhanced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 239-242)

Pages:

2336-2341

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhao M, Wu S S, Luo J R, et al: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 200(18/19) (2006), p.5407

Google Scholar

[2] Tian X B, Wei C B, Yang S Q, et al: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 198(1/3) (2005), p.454

Google Scholar

[3] Song G L, D St Jhon: Corros. Sci. Vol. 46(6) (2004), p.1381

Google Scholar

[4] Zeng R C, Ke W, Xu Y B: Meta. Trans.Vol. 37(7) (2001), pp.673-681

Google Scholar

[5] Ambat R, Zhou w: Surf. Coat. Techno. Vol. 179 (2004), pp.124-134

Google Scholar

[6] Gao J, Tu Y H, Li J Q :Corros.Defen.Techn.Vol. 17(3) (2005), pp.169-171

Google Scholar

[7] Eppensteiner F W, Jenkins M R : Meta. Finish.Vol. 100(1) (2002), pp.479-491

Google Scholar

[8] Nan J Y, Li C F, Yu B L : Metallu. Mater Trans. Vol. 39 (3) (2008), pp.703-715

Google Scholar

[9] Niu L Y, Jiang Z H, Li G Y, et al: Surf Coat Techn. Vol.200 (2006), p.3021

Google Scholar

[10] Cui X F, Li Q F, Li Y, et al: Appl. Surf. Sci. Vol. 255 (2008), pp.2098-2103.

Google Scholar

[11] Liu J R, Guo Y N, Huang W D: Surf Coat Techn. Vol. 201 (2006), pp.1536-1541.

Google Scholar

[12] Zhang S Y, Li Q, Chen B et al: Electrochim Acta (2009), doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.07. 053

Google Scholar

[13] J A Dorscha, A Cooka, A Kevin: Phytochemistry, Vol. 62(2003), pp.691-706

Google Scholar