Residual Stress Analysis in Different Thickness TiN Coatings on High-Speed-Steel Substrates

Article Preview

Abstract:

TiN coatings were deposited on AISI M2 high-speed-steel (HSS) substrates by multi-arc ion plating technique. The thickness of substrate was 1.0 mm and five thicknesses of TiN coatings were 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0 and 11.0 μm, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been used for measuring residual stresses. The stresses along five different directions (Ψ=0°, 20.7°, 30°, 37.8° and 45°) have been measured by recording the peak positions of TiN (220) reflection for each 2θ at different tilt angles Ψ. Residual compressive stresses present in the TiN coatings. Furthermore, the results revealed that the value of the residual stresses in TiN coatings was high. While the coatings thickness changed from 3 to 11 μm, the residual stresses varied from -3.22 to -2.04 GPa, the intrinsic stresses -1.32 to -0.14 GPa, the thermal stresses -1.86 to -1.75 GPa. The residual stresses in TiN coatings showed a nonlinear change. When the coatings thickness was about 8 μm, the residual stresses in TiN coatings reached to the maximum value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 239-242)

Pages:

2331-2335

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.M. Suh, B.W. Hwang, R.I. Murakami: Mater. Sci. Eng., A Struct. Mater.: Prop. Microstruct. Process Vol. 343 (2003), p.1

Google Scholar

[2] X.C Zhang, B.S Xu, H.D. Wang: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 42(2006), p.18(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] J.H. Huang, F.Y. Ouyang, G.P.Yu: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 201(2007), p.7043

Google Scholar

[4] J. Gerth, U. Wiklund: Wear Vol. 264(2008), p.885

Google Scholar

[5] X. Zheng, J. Li, Y. Zhou: Acta Mater Vol. 52 (2004), p.3313.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Karlsson, U.L. Hultman, J.E. Sundgren: Thin Solid Films Vol. 371(2000),p.167

Google Scholar

[7] F.R. Lamastra, F. Leonardi, R. Montanari, F. Casadei, T. Valente, G. Gusmano: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 200 (2006), p.6172

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.013

Google Scholar

[8] J.H. Huang, C.H. Ma, H.Y. Chen: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 201 (2006), p.3199

Google Scholar

[9] B.A. Lyashenko, A.V. Ruthovskii, E.B. Soroka, N.V. Lipinskaya: Strength of materials Vol. 33(2001), p.344

Google Scholar

[10] N.B. Thomsena, A. Horsewell, K.S. Mogensen: Thin Solid Films Vol. 333(1998), p.50

Google Scholar

[11] M.R. James, J. Lu: Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, 2nd ed., chapter, 5, Fairmont Press, Lilburn(1996)

Google Scholar

[12] M. Gelfi, G.M. La Vecchia, N. Lecis, S. Troglio: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 192 (2005),p.263.

Google Scholar

[13] G.G. Stoney: Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A Vol. 82(1909), p.172.

Google Scholar

[14] Q.F. Ma, R.S. Fang, L.C. Xiang, S. Guo: Handbook of utility thermal physical properties, chapter, 21, Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Mechanical Press (1986) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar