Progressive Collapse Analysis of Multi-Storey Composite Frames

Yu Yin Wang; Man Xu; Lan Hui Guo; Su Mei Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.1173

Paper Titles

Flexural Behavior of Prestressed UHPC Beams
p.1145

Service Life Prediction Based on Carbonation Reliability Theory for Reinforced Concrete under Mechanical Load
p.1156

The Experimental Research and Contrastive Analysis on the Attachments of Semi-Rigid Nodes in the Beam-Column T-Typed Member and End Plate of Steel Frame
p.1163

Nonlinear Analysis of CFT Composite Frame with Floor Slab
p.1168

Progressive Collapse Analysis of Multi-Storey Composite Frames
p.1173

Correlation of Strength, Rubber Content, and Water-Cement Ratio in Roller Compacted Rubberized Concrete
p.1179

Analysis of an Office Building Glass Roof
p.1186

The Combined Application of Intermittent Strengthening Strip and After-Irrigation-Strip in Certain Long Concrete Structure
p.1190

Effects of Residual Stress on Bearing Capacity of Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel Members with “л” Section under Axial Compressive Force
p.1195

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 243-249Progressive Collapse Analysis of Multi-Storey...

Progressive Collapse Analysis of Multi-Storey Composite Frames

Abstract:

In this paper, a 9-storey Benchmark frame model was used to analyze the response of joints due to sudden column loss. On the basis of the substructure model, the static and dynamic nonlinear analyses were conducted seriatim using the alternative path method. It is found that the removals of the ground columns bring high-level joint moments and mild increasing of axial forces. In particular, the removal of side column with pin-ended connection results in the largest vertical displacement of adjacent joint and increase the flexural demands to the next joint. For this model, the most critical case appears at the failure of hinged side column, the next is the rigid side column.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering and Architecture

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

1173-1178

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.1173

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Yu Yin Wang, Man Xu, Lan Hui Guo, Su Mei Zhang

Keywords:

Alternate Path Method, Composite Structure, Dynamic Amplification Factor

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] ASCE. SEI/ASCE7-05 minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S]. Washington DC: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784408094.err

Google Scholar

[2] Fu Feng. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(1):1269-1278.

Google Scholar

[3] Hu Xiaobin, Qian Jiaru. Building Structure, 2006, 36(supplement): 79-83(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] BS 5950, Structural use of steelwork in buildings, Part 1: Code of practice for design-Rolled and welded sections [S]. London (UK), 2001.

DOI: 10.3403/00413147u

Google Scholar

[5] Draft prEN 1991-1-7, Eurocode 1-Actions on structures, Part 1-7: General Actions - Accidental actions. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005.

Google Scholar

[6] General Service Administration. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, 2003.

Google Scholar

[7] U. S. Department of Defense. Unified Facilities Criteria: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, UFC 4-023-03, 2005.

Google Scholar

[8] Ohtori Y, Christenson R.E., Spencer Jr. B.F., and Dyke S.J. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130: 366-385.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhong Shantong. Unified theory of concrete filled steel tube—research and application. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006(in Chinese).

Google Scholar