Numerical Simulation for Progressive Collapse of Underground Structure under its Internal Blast Load

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical simulation for the progressive collapse of the underground structure under its internal blast load has been reported in this paper. The three dimensional model of the underground structure with two-story and two-spans in both x-direction and z-direction covered with soil was built with explicit dynamic analytical software LS-DYNA. An improved method by considering the impact of the blast load was proposed in the simulation. Solid-fluid interaction algorithm, the erosion algorithm and stress initialization are used in the simulation. It is found that, compared with the alternative path method, the improved method gives more accurate predictions of the progressive collapse process. The improved direct simulation method is more cost-effective than the direct simulation method. The impact of the internal explosion can’t be ignored. The analysis may provide important information for the additional design guidance on progressive collapse of underground structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 250-253)

Pages:

2824-2828

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ASCE7. Minimum design for buildings and other structures. Reston (Virginia): American Society of CivilEngineers; 2002.

Google Scholar

[2] Longinow A, Mniszewski KR. Protecting buildings against vehicle bomb attacks. Practice PeriodicalStruct Design Construct 1996; 1(1):51–4.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(1996)1:1(51)

Google Scholar

[3] United States Army Corps of Engineers. Technical instructions: structural design criteria for buildings;TI809-02. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC; 1999.

DOI: 10.21236/ada404155

Google Scholar

[4] Corley WG, Mlakar PF, Sozen MA, Thornton CH. The oklahoma city bombing: summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation. J Perform Construct Facil ASCE 1998;12(3):100-12.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1998)12:3(100)

Google Scholar

[5] Y.R. Zheng and H.GAO: Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2007 [In Chinese].

Google Scholar

[6] Livermore Software Technology Corporation: LS-DYNA theory manual, California, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] DoD. Unified facilities criteria (UFC). DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Department of Defense. UFC 4-010-01. Washington (DC): US Army Corps of Engineering. 31. 2002.

DOI: 10.21236/ada530875

Google Scholar

[8] GSA. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. The US General Services Administration; 2003.

Google Scholar

[9] Shi YC. Dynamic response and damage mechanism of reinforced concrete structures under blastloading. Ph.D. thesis, P.R. China: Tianjin University. 2009 [In Chinese].

Google Scholar