Growth and Photovoltaic Performance of Single-Crystal TiO₂ Nanorod Array Directly on Transparent Conducting Substrates

Abstract:

In this study, single-crystal TiO₂ nanorod (NR) arrays were used as the photoanodes of dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC). The post-annealing treatment was carried out in air, O₂, N₂ and vacuum atomsphere. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have been used to characterize the structure, morphology and crystallity of these samples. Although the nanorod arrays which undergo annealing remained the single-crystal structure without any change in the morphology, considerable improvement in the nanorod solar cell performance was obtained. The high efficicency of 4.42 % was achieved in the cells containing nanorods which were annealed in air at 500 °C for 30 min. In comparison, the cell fabricated using TiO₂ samples without post- annealing treatment exhibited a low efficiency of just 2.1 %. Such a large improvement (280 %) was mainly attributed to the faster electron transport and the lower charge recombination rate after annealing due to an increase of the depletion width. Otherwise, the cell performance improvement may result from an enhancement in the adhension and electrical contact at the TiO₂/FTO interface. The in-depth study shows that the solar cell efficiency was strongly dependent on the annealing ambience, too.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 306-307)
• Pages: 159-163
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.306-307.159
• Online since: August 2011
• Authors: Xiu Quan Gu, Yu Long Zhao, Ying Huai Qiang
• Keywords: Dye Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC), Nanorod, Single Crystal, TiO₂

References

[1] B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel: Nature Vol. 353 (1991), p.737.

[2] M.K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, R. Humphry-Baker, E. Muller, P. Liska, N. Vlachopoulos, and M. Gratzel: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 115 (1993), p.6382.

[3] E. Ghadiri, N. Taghavinia, S.M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel and J.E. Moser: Nano Lett. Vol. 10 (2010), p.1632.

[4] H.J. Koo, K. Kim, N.G. Park, S. Hwang, C. Park, and C. Kim: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 92 (2008), p.142103.

[5] S. Ito, N.L.C. Ha, G. Rothenberger, P. Liska, P. Comte, S.M. Zakeeruddin, P. Péchy, M.K. Nazeeruddin and M. Grätzel: Chem Commun. Vol. 38 (2006), p.4004.

DOI: 10.1039/b608279c

[6] S.J. Roh, R.S. Mane, S.K. Min, W.J. Lee, C.D. Lokhande and S.H. Han: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 89 (2006), p.253512.

[7] P.T. Hsiao, Y.L. Tung and H. Teng: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 114 (2010), p.6762.

[8] Y. Alivova and Z.Y. Fan: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 95 (2009), p.063504.

[9] C.Y. Huang, Y.C. Hsu, J.G. Chen, V. Suryanarayanan, K.M. Lee and K.C. Ho: Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells Vol. 90 (2006), p.2391.

[10] B. Liu and E.S. Aydil: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 131 (2008), p.3985.

[11] O.K. Varghese, M. Paulose and C.A. Grimes: Nat. Nanotech. Vol. 4 (2009) p.592.

[12] J.R. Jenning, A. Ghicov, L.M. Peter, P. Schmuki and A.B. Walker: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 130 (2008), p.13364.

[13] M.K. Nazeeruddin, F. D. Angelis, S. Fantacci, A. Selloni, G. Viscardi, P. Liska, S. Ito, B. Takeru and M. Grätzel: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 127 (2005), p.16835.

DOI: 10.1021/ja052467l

[14] X. Feng, K. Shankar, O.K. Varghese, M. Paulose, T.J. Latempa and C.A. Grimes: Nano Lett. Vol. 8 (2008), p.3781.

[15] H.E. Wang, Z. Chen, Y.H. Leung, C. Luan, C. Liu, Y. Tang, C. Yan, W. Zhang, J.A. Zapien, I. Bello and S.T. Lee: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 96 (2010), p.263104.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3442913

[16] H. Wang, Y. Bai, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Li and L. Guo: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 114 (2010), p.16451.

[17] J.H. Bang and P.V. Kamat: Adv. Funct. Mater. Vol. 20 (2010), p.1.

[18] A. Kumar, A.R. Madaria and C. Zhou: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 114 (2010), p.7787.

[19] S. Meng and E. Kaxiras: Nano Lett. Vol. 10 (2010), p.1238.