Effect of Microshot Peening on Residual Stress of High-Toughness Spring Steel

Abstract:

In general, shot peening is a surface treatment that improves the performance of engineering components, since application of surface compressive stresses reduces the tensile component of stress. In the shot peening process, the medium consists of small spheres, which are usually made of high-carbon cast steel; the diameter of the spheres is in the range from 0.3 to 1.2 mm. More recently, a new type of microshot has been developed to enhance the peening effect. The diameter of the new spheres is in the range from 0.02 to 0.15 mm. The effect of microshot peening on the residual stress of spring steel was investigated. The projective method of the microshot was of the compressed air type. The microshot of 0.1 mm diameter was high-carbon cast steel and cemented carbide, and the workpiece used was the commercially spring steel JIS-SUP10. The effect that process variables such as shot speed and peening time have primarily on residual stress was studied. The surface layer of the workpieces was sufficiently deformed by microshot peening. The residual stress was observed near the surface. At a large number of cycles to fracture, microshot peening can more effectively enhance the fatigue strength. The use of hard microshots such as cemented carbide was found to cause a significantly enhanced peening effect for spring steel.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 325)
• Pages: 745-750
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.325.745
• Online since: August 2011
• Authors: Yasunori Harada, Daisuke Gowa, Toshiya Tsuji, Yuji Kobayashi
• Keywords: Fatigue Life, Microshot, Plastic Deformation, Residual Stress, Shot Peening, Spring Steel, Surface Treatment

References

[1] V. Azar, B. Hashemi and Mahboobeh Rezaee Yazdi: Surface and Coatings Technology, Vol. 204 (2010), p.3546.

[2] S. Tekeli: Materials Letters, Vol. 57 (2002), p.604.

[3] A. Wick, V. Schulze and O. Vöhringer: Mater. Science and Eng. A, Vol. 293 (2000), p.191.

[4] Y. Koyasu, M. Yanase, O. Nakano,Y. Izawa and M. Onoda: Wire J. Int., Vol. 29 (1996), p.88.

[5] S. Kikuchi, Y. Nakahara, J. Komotori: Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 32 (2010), p.403.

[6] A. Inoue, I. Yoshii, H. Kimura, K. Okumura and J. Kurosaki: Mater. Trans., Vol. 44 (2003), p.2391.

[7] K. Oguri: J. Mater. Process. Techno., Vol. 211 (2011), p.1395.

[8] S. Wang, Y. Li, M. Yao and R. Wang: J. Mater. Process. Techno., Vol. 73 (1998), p.64.