Design of a Dynamic Magnetic Field Steered Cathodic Arc Source in Arc Ion Plating

Abstract:

In this work, a dynamic arched magnetic field steered arc source was deigned by virtue of Finite Element Method (FEM) calculation. The magnetic field was produced by two main electromagnetic coils so that the magnetic field can be adjusted with the help of the two current I₁ and I₂, where I₁ is the current to the internal coil mounted coaxially in a magnetic yoke generating a static arched magnetic field to confine the cathode spots and I₂ is the current to the external coil mounted coaxially outside the above yoke adjusting the position of the vertex of arch. Base on the results of simulation, it was found this design enable the sweeping of the arc spots on the target surface by means of adjusting the ratio of current (I₁/ I₂) , and cause the arc distribute evenly on the cathode surface in the diffuse arc mode transferred from the constricted arc mode. The effects of the target thickness and current ratio on the configuration and intensity of dynamic arched magnetic field were investigated. The optimized operating modes was proposed and discussed.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 340)
• Pages: 167-172
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.340.167
• Online since: September 2011
• Authors: Wen Chang Lang
• Keywords: AIP, Cathode Spots Movement, Finite Element Method (FEM)

References

[1] Kimblin C W. J Appl Phys, 1974; 45: 5235.

[2] Hantzsche E, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci2003; 31: 799.

[3] Boxman R L, Goldsmith S, Greenwood A. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci, 1997; 25: 1174.

[4] Anders A. Cathodic Arcs: From Fractal Spots to Energetic Condensation, Chap3, 2008: 75.

[5] Boxman R L. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci, 2001; 29: 762.

[6] Boxman R L, Zhitomirsky V N. Rev Sci Instrum, 2006; 77: 6748.

[7] Siemroth P, Schultrich B, Schulke T. Surf. Coat. Technol, 1995; 74: 92.

[8] Boxman R L, Goldsmith S. Surf. Coat. Tech. 1992; 52: 39.

[9] Akari K, Tamagaki H, Kumakiri T, Tsuji K. Surf. Coat. Tech, 1990; 43: 312.

[10] Martin P J, Bendavid A. Surf. Coat. Tech, 2001; 142: 7.

[11] Juttner B, Kleberg I. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2000; 33: (2025).

[12] G. Smith C. Phys. Rev. 1948; 73: 543.

[13] Fang DY. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1983 ; Ps-11: 110.

[14] Swift P D.J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 1996; 29: (2025).

[15] Walke P J, New R, Care C M. Surf. Coat. Tech. 1993; 59: 126.

[16] Ives M, Brooks J S, Cawley J, Burgmer W. Surf. Coat. Tech. 1991; 49: 244.

[17] Boxman R L, Zhitomirsky V N. Rev. Sci. Instrum 2006; 77.

[18] Boxman R L, Beilis I I, Gidalevich E, Zhitomirsky V N. Pro. ISDEIV. XXIst Int. Sym. Dischar. Electr. Insul. Vacuum, Vols 1 and 2, Proceedings 2004; 21: 473.

DOI: 10.1109/deiv.2004.1422650

[19] Siemroth P, Zimmer O, Schulke T, Vetter J. Surf. Coat. Tech. 1997; 94: 592.

[20] Zhitomirsky N, Boxman R L, Goldsmith S. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2004; 185: 1.

[21] Arbilly D, Boxman R L, Goldsmith S, Rothwarf A, Kaplan L. Thin Solid Films. 1994; 62: 253.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90295-x

[22] Zhitomirsky V N, Boxman R L, Goldsmith S. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1995; 13: 2233.

[23] Kaplan L, Zhitomirsky V N, Goldsmith S, Boxman R L, Rusman I. Surf. Coat. Tech. 1995; 76: 181.