Studies on the Relationship between Phytoplankton with Environmental Factors in the Southern Ocean

Article Preview

Abstract:

The relationship between phytoplankton abundance, Chl a concentration and environmental factors was analyzed on the investigation data in the Southern Ocean during 1989-2009. In the sea area near Prydz Bay, the water abundance of phytoplankton cells was 3.9×104 ~2.83×105 cells/dm3, and the average water abundance of phytoplankton cells was 7.38×104cells/dm3. In the net samples, the dominant species were Fragilariopsis kerguelensis, Fragilariopsis curta, Pseudo-nitzschia lineola, Eucampia antarctica, Thalassiosira antarctica, Corethron criophilum, etc. In the water samples, the dominant species were Fragilariopsis curta, Pseudo-nitzschia lineola, etc. The regression statistical analysis showed the phytoplankton cell abundance was in significant positive correlation with water temperature, DO, and Chl a, and significant negative correlation with PO43- and NO3-.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

2295-2301

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Rui-xiang, Yu J-L, Lu P-D.The quantity variation of net phytoplankton and their relations with environmental factors in the coast of Davis, Antarctica. Coll. Antar. Sci. Exp., Beijing:China Ocean Press, 1986,3:116-119.(in Chinese with English abstract)

Google Scholar

[2] Sun Jun,Liu Dong-yan,Ning Xiu-ren,Liu Cheng-gang, Phytoplankton in the Prydz bay and the adjacent Indian sector of the Southern Ocean during the austral summer 2001/2002, Oceanol. et Limnol. Sinica,2003,34(5): 519-532

Google Scholar

[3] Zhu Gen-hai,Ning Xiu-ren, Liu Zi-lin, A study on distribution feature of nano- and micro- phytoplankton in Prydz Bay and its adjacent sea area, Antarctica during 1989/1990. Oceanog. in China,1998a,9:31-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Google Scholar

[4] Zhu Gen-hai, Ning Xiu-ren, Z. Liu, A stud on nano- and microphytoplankton in Prydz Bay and its adjacent sea area, Antarctica during 1992/1993. Oceanog. in China,1998b, 9:28-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Google Scholar

[5] Zhu Gen-hai,Ning X-R,Cai Y-M, Liu Zi-lin, Phytoplankton in Prydz Bay and its adjacent sea area of Antarctica during the austral summer (1998/1999). Acta Botanica Sinica, 2003,45(4): 390-398.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhu Gen-hai,CHEN Li-hong, JIN mao, LIU Zi-lin, Studies on the Community Structure of Phytoplankton and its Environmental Restriction in the Water Encircling the Antarctica. Prog. Environm. Sci. & Tech., 2011,III: 60–65.

Google Scholar

[7] NingXiu-ren, Liu Z-L,Zhu G-H,Shi J-X. Size structure of standing stock and production of phytoplankton and the environmental limitation in Prydz Bay and the adjacent Indian sector of the Southern Ocean in the austral summer of 1989/1990. Oceanog. in China,1998, 9:1-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Zi-lin,Shi J-X,Chen Z-Y,Zhu G-H,Ning X-R. Distribution of standing crop and primary productivity of phytoplankton and POC in Prydz Bay and the adjacent area during austral summer of 1991/1992. Oceanog. in China,1998, 9:55-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Google Scholar

[9] Doty, M. & Oguri, M. ,The island mass effect. J. Conseil, 1956,22, 33-37.

Google Scholar

[10] El-Sayed, S. Z. ,Productivity of the Antarctic waters: A reappraisal. In: marine phytoplankton and productivity. ed. by Holm-Hansen O, L Boles & R Gilles, 1984,19-34.

DOI: 10.1029/ln008p0019

Google Scholar

[11] Menzel, D. W. & J. H. Ryther. (1961): Nutrients limiting the production of phytoplankton in the Sargasso Sea with special reference to iron. Deep-Sea Res., 7, 276-281.

DOI: 10.1016/0146-6313(61)90045-4

Google Scholar

[12] Allanson, B. R., R C Hart & J R E Lujeharms (1981): Observations on the nutrients, chlorophyll and primary production of the Southern Ocean South of Africa. S. Afr. J. Antarct. Res., 10, 3-14.

Google Scholar