Synthesis and Electrochemical Performance of Mesoporous Carbon Foams by Microemulsion Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we demonstrated the preparation and electrochemical performance of mesoporous carbon foams as electrode materials for ultracapacitors. By using n-octane as oil phase, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and butanol as emulsifiers, resorcinol and formaldehyde dissolved in water as the aqueous phase, an O/W microemulsion system was obtained. Mesoporous carbon foams (MCFs) were prepared by the polymerization of the O/W microemulsion, followed by drying and carbonization and subsequently activation at 1273 K by KOH under nitrogen atmosphere. The mesoporous carbon foams were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analyzer. The results show that MCFs have specific surface area of 666.7 m2/g, total pore volume of 0.36 cm3/g and the most probable pore size of 4 nm. The electrochemical properties of the resultant mesoporous carbon foams have been investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge with a three-electrode system in electrolyte of 6 mol/L KOH solution. The CV curves show quite rectangular shape under the scan rate of 5-20 mV/s, suggesting a typical nonfaradic adsorption/desorption reaction. The mesoporous carbon foams possess linear galvanostatic discharge curves under the current densities of 10-50 mA/cm2 and corresponding specific capacitance values are 132.6-172.1 F/g. Thus the MCFs have good electrochemical performance and they provide an important candidate for electrode materials used in ultracapacitors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

3416-3419

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Burke: J. Power Sources Vol. 91(2000), p.37.

Google Scholar

[2] A. B. Fnertes, F. Pico and J. M. Rojo: J. Power Sources Vol. 133(2004), p.329.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Frackowiak and F. Beguin: Carbon Vol. 39(2001), p.937.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Niu, E. K. Sichel, D. Moy and H. Tennent: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 70(1997), p.1480.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Lahaye: Fuel Vol. 77(1998), p.54.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Yu, L. Zhang, B. Cheng and Y. Su: J. Phys. Chem. Vol.111 (2007), p.10582.

Google Scholar

[7] Ch. Emmenegger, Ph. Mauron, P. Sudan, P. Wenger, V. Hermann, R. Gallay and A. Zuttel: J. Power Sources Vol. 124(2003), p.321.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00590-1

Google Scholar

[8] M. Liu, L. Gan , C. Tian, J. Zhu, Z. Xu, Z. Hao and L. Chen. Carbon Vol.45 (2007), p.3042.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Lv, M. Liu, L. Gan, Y. Cao, L. Chen, W. Xiong, Z. Xu, Z. Hao, H. Liu and L Chen: Chem. Lett. Vol.40 (2011), p.236.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Jang and H. Ha. Langmuir Vol. 18(2002), p.5613.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Ethayaraja, C. Ravikumar, D. Muthukumaran, K. Dutta, and R. Bandyopadhyaya: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 111(2007), p.3246.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Xu, Y. Ni, Z. Zhang, X. Ge and Q. Ye: Mater. Lett. Vol. 57 (2003), p.3070.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Gamby, P. L. Tabem and P. J. Simon: Power Sources Vol.101 (2001), p.109.

Google Scholar