Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Land Use Change in Coastal Zone of Bohai Sea in Last 30 Years

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aimed to evaluate response of ecosystem service value to land use change in coastal zone of Bohai sea in last 30years, Series satellite remote sensing images obtained in 1988, 1998 and 2007 were employed to surveyed land use change integrated field surveying,firstly.Then an unit table of ecosystem services function value of main land use type was created. The response of ecosystem service value to land use change in 13 coastal zone regions of the Bohai sea in last 30 years was assessed. The result showed: the ecosystem service value lost 60.74×108RMB in coastal zone of Bohai sea caused by land use change in last 30years. Amony the 13 coastal zone region, the ecosystem service value increased only in Yantai coastal zone region and Dalian coastal zone region, there are 0.36×108RMB and 0.20×108RMB,respectively. While the ecosystem service value reduced in 11 coastal zone regions, such as Yingkou coastal zone region, Panjin coastal zone region, Binzhou coastal zone region, et al.the total lost value is 60.30×108RMB.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

3963-3967

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Daily G C, eds. Natural Service: Social dependence on natural ecosystem[M]. Washington: Island press(1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Costanza R , d'Arge R , Groot R , et al. Nature, 386 : 253-260(1997).

Google Scholar

[3] Turner, R. K., C. J. M. Jeroen, B. van den, T. Soderqvist, et al.. Ecological Economics, 35 (1): 7-23(2000).

Google Scholar

[4] Richard B. Howarth , Stephen Farber. Ecological Economics , 41(3) :421-429(2002).

Google Scholar

[5] De Groot R S, WilsonM A, Bouman RM J. Ecological Econom ics, 41: 393 – 408(2002).

Google Scholar

[6] Boumans R, Costanza R, Farley J, et al. Ecological Economics, 41: 529-560(2002).

Google Scholar

[7] KreuterU P, HarrisH G, MatlockM D, et al. Ecological Economics, 39: 333-346(2001).

Google Scholar

[8] Carins, J. Ecosystem Health, 1997,3 (3): 185-194

Google Scholar

[9] CHEN Zhongxin, ZHANG Xinshi. Chinese Science B ulletin, 45(10):870-876(2000). (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Anning SUO, Dongzhi ZHAO,Fengshou ZHANG, et al. Marine Environment Science, 12(2):36-42(2009). (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Konarska KM, Sutton P C, Castellon M. Ecological Economics, 41: 491-507(2002).

Google Scholar

[12] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al.. Nature, 387: 253 – 260(1997).

Google Scholar

[13] Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia,Leng Yunfa, et al. Journal of Natural Resource, 18(2) :189-196(2003). (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Arturo Ruiz- Luna, César A, Berlanga- Robles. Landscape Ecology, 18: 159-171(2003).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024461215456

Google Scholar

[15] Zhang Xuliang, Ye Siyuan, Yin Ping, et al, Chinses Journal of Ecology, 27(12):35-42(2008).(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] Holmlund CM,HammerM.. Ecological Economics, 29: 253-268(1999)

Google Scholar