Effect of Oxygen Flow Rate on the Properties of Nanocolumnar ZnO Thin Films Prepared Using Radio Frequency Magnetron Sputtering System for Ultraviolet Sensor Applications

Abstract:

Nanostructured zinc oxide (ZnO) thin films were deposited on glass substrates using radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering system at different oxygen flow rates ranges between 0 to 40 sccm. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images was revealed that nanocolumnar ZnO structure thin films are produced on the substrates using high purity ZnO as the target at RF power of 250 W in the argon and oxygen gas mixture ambient. The XRD spectra reveal that the deposited films are preferentially grown along the c-axis indicating high ZnO crystallinity. The ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra show that all samples are very transparent in the visible region (400 – 800 nm) with average transparency above 80 %. The photocurrent properties indicate that ZnO thin film prepared at oxygen flow rate of 20 sccm has the optimum characteristic for ultraviolet sensor applications. This finding suggested that the oxygen flow rates play important role and has critical value for semiconducting nanocolumnar ZnO growth in the sputtering system, which can produce ZnO thin film with high sensitivity of ultraviolet detection.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 364)
• Pages: 1-6
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.364.1
• Online since: October 2011
• Authors: Mohamad Hafiz Mamat, Syafinaz Wan Anwar Wan, Mohamed Zahidi Musa, Zuraida Khusaimi, Mohd Firdaus Malek, Salina Muhamad, Diyana Md Sin, Mohamad Rusop
• Keywords: Nanocolumnar, Oxygen Flow Rate, RF Magnetron Sputtering, UV Sensor, Zinc Oxide (ZnO)

References

[1] J.Y. Park, D.J. Lee and S.S. Kim: Nanotechnology Vol. 16 (2005), p. (2044).

[2] C.F. Yu, C.W. Sung, S.H. Chen, and S.J. Sun: Appl. Surface Sci. Vol. 256 (2009), p.792.

[3] H. Chen, J. Ding, S. Ma: Superlattices and Microstructures Vol. 49 (2011), p.176.

[4] J. H. Jun, H. Seong, K. Cho, B.M. Moon, and S. Kim: Ceramics International Vol. 35(7) (2009), p.2797.

[5] Y.B.X. J.M. Liu, L.J. Wang, Q.F. Su, and W.M. Shi: Journal of Crystal Growth Vol. 300 (2007) p.353.

[6] S. Jian, D. Qian, L.F. Juan, H.H. Qin, L.Z. Jun, and Z.X. Qing: Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy Vol. 54(1) (2011), p.102.

[7] X.C. Wang, X.M. Chen, and B.H. Yang: J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 488 (2009), p.232.

[8] H. Zhu, J. Hüpkes, E. Bunte, S.M. Huang: Appl. Surface Sci. Vol. 256 (2010), p.4601.

[9] Y.Y. Kim, B.H. Kong, and H.K. Cho: J. of Crystal Growth Vol. 330 (2011), p.17.

[10] M.H. Mamat, M.Z. Sahdan, S. Amizam, H.A. Rafaie, Z. Khusaimi, A. Zain Ahmed, S. Abdullah and M. Rusop: Mat. Research Inn. Vol. 13 (3) (2009), p.153.

DOI: 10.1179/143307509x437482

[11] K.B. Sundaram and A. Khan, Thin Solid Films Vol. 295 (1997), p.87.

[12] J. Zhang and W. Que: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells Vol. 94 (2010), p.2181.

[13] Y.J. Jiang, D.X. Zhang, H.K. Cai, K. Tao, Y. Xue, Y.P. Sui, L.S. Wang, J.F. Zhao, and J. Wang: J. Physc.: Conference Series Vol. 152 (2009), p.012030.

[14] L.P. Peng, L. Fang, X.F. Yang, and Y.J. Li: J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 484 (2009), p.575.

[15] J. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, Dover Publications, New York, (1971).

[16] O. Lupan, T. Pauporte´, L. Chow, B. Viana, F. Pelle´, L.K. Ono, B. Roldan Cuenya, and H. Heinrich: Appl. Surface Sci. Vol. 256 (2010), p.1895.

[17] T. Tsuji and M. Hirohashi: Appl. Surface Sci. Vol. 157 (2000), p.47.