Comparison on Effect of Alternating and Stationary Magnetic Field on the Conductivity of NaCl Solutions

Article Preview

Abstract:

NaCl solutions of different concentrations were exposed to alternating and stationary magnetic fields. The conductivity change of the NaCl solutions was measured. The change of the conductivity of the NaCl solutions under different amplitudes magnetic fields was studied. The differences of effect between stationary and alternating magnetic field on the conductivity of the NaCl solutions was compared. The principle of the effects of magnetic fields on conductivity of NaCl solutions was discussed. The process of magnetic moment deflexion effected by the alternating magnetic field was analyzed, which explained the experimental results that the conductivity was increased more larger when then the NaCl solutions were exposing to alternating magnetic field than stationary magnetic field.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 391-392)

Pages:

1095-1099

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Kobe: Crystal English. Vol. 5 (2002), p.243.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Kobe, P.J. McGuiness, T. Meden, E. Sarantopoulou, Z. Kollia A.C. Cefalas: Material Science English C Vol. 23 (2003), p.811.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2003.09.136

Google Scholar

[3] E. Chibowski, L. Hołysz: Colloids Surface A Vol. 222 (2003), p.41.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Hołysz, E. Chibowski: Water Research Vol. 37 (2003), p.3351.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Chibowski, L. Hołysz: Water Science Technology Vol. 49 (2004), p.169.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Chibowski, L. Hołysz: Langmuir Vol. 21 (2005), p.8114.

Google Scholar

[7] F. Alimi, M. Tlili, C. Gabrielli, M. Georges, M. Ben Amor: Water Research Vol. 40 (2006), p. (1941).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Lafait, L. Legrand, M.O. Monod, Y. Thomas: Langmuir Vol. 21 (2005), p.2293.

Google Scholar

[9] M.C. Amiri, Ali A. Dadkhah: Colloids Surface. A Vol. 278 (2006), p.252.

Google Scholar

[10] V. Gupta, S. Nath, S. Chand: Polymer Vol. 43 (2002), p.3387.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Eshaghi, M. Gholizadeh: Talanta Vol. 64 (2004), p.558.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Fujiwara, K. Mitsuda and Y. Tanimoto: J. Phys. Chem. B Vol. 110 (2006), p.13965.

Google Scholar

[13] Manabu Sueda, Akio Katsuki et al: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 111 (2007), p.14389.

Google Scholar

[14] R. Ohata, N. Tomita and Y. Ikada: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science Vol. 270 (2004), p.413.

Google Scholar

[15] Alimi Fathi, Tlili Mohameda et al: Water Research Vol. 40 (2006), p. (1941).

Google Scholar

[16] S. Murad: Chemical Physics Letters Vol. 417 (2006), p.465.

Google Scholar

[17] M.C. Amiri, A.A. Dadkhah: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects Vol. 278 (2006), p.252.

Google Scholar