Research on the Relationship among Cost Control, Technical Investment and Franchising Period in BOT Projects

Article Preview

Abstract:

Under the double win constraint condition between the public and private party, this paper takes VFM (Value for Money) as the evaluating indicator of the government’s earnings, uses the rate of return on investment as the evaluating indicator of the project company’s earnings in order to analyze the relationship among cost control, technical investment and franchising period. We found that the effective cost control can shorten the franchising period and hardly depend on the technical investment. If the contribution of the technical investment to the reduction of the maintenance cost is comparatively high, increasing technical investment can effectively shorten the franchising period, otherwise it has to postpone the franchising period so as to meet the earnings target of both the public and private parties when increasing the technical investment

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Pages:

5166-5171

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Xueqing. Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnerships in Infr astructure Development[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005, 131(1): 4-14.

Google Scholar

[2] Li Qiming, Shen Liyin. Decision-Making Model on Concession Term for Infrastructure BOT Projects[J]. Journal of industrial engneering management, 2000, 14(1): 43-46.

Google Scholar

[3] Shen Liyin, Li Qiming. Alternative concession model for build operate transfer contract projects[J]. Journal of construction Engineering and management, 2002, 128(4): 326~330.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:4(326)

Google Scholar

[4] Qin Xuan. Quantitative Concession Period Model for Build Operate Transfer Contract Project on CAPM[J]. Journal of industrial engneering management, 2005, 19(2): 60-63.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao Lili, Tan Deqing. Analysis on Concession Term Decisions of BOT Projects Based on Social Benefits[J]. Journal of industrial engneering management, 2009, 23(2): 125-130.

Google Scholar

[6] Yang Hongwei, Zhou Jing, He Jianmin. Decision-Making Model on Concession Term for Traffic BOT Project on the Basis of Game Theory[J]. Journal of industrial engneering management, 2003, 17(3): 93-95.

Google Scholar

[7] Engel E., Fisher R., and Galetovic A., 1997, Revenue-based auction and unbundling infrastructure franchises, Washington D.C., IFM-112, 1-29.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang X. Q., 2006, Abou Rizk S M. Determining a reasonable concession period for private sector provision of public works and services, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(5), 622-631.

DOI: 10.1139/l06-010

Google Scholar

[9] PFI Committee of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Construction Management Committee. The problems and solution of Infrastructure PFI project[R]. 2008, 3: 62-63.

Google Scholar

[10] Dirk Daube, Susann Vollrath, Hans Wilhelm Alfen, 2008, A comparison of Project Finance and the Forfeiting Model as financing forms for PPP projects in Germany, International Journal of Project Management , 26, 376–387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.001

Google Scholar