Why Mechanical Properties of Collagen Scaffolds Should Be Tested in a Pseudo-Physiological Environment?

Article Preview

Abstract:

Collagen gels constitute an adequate scaffold for supporting the adhesion, proliferation and tissue regeneration of vascular cells inside a bioreactor. However, their mechanical properties should be enhanced not only for their manipulation but also to resist the mechanical constraints applied in the bioreactor. Actually, assessing the mechanical properties of a hydrogel requires many precautions since they are very sensitive to the environmental conditions (temperature, ionic strength, aqueous environment, etc). Whereas mechanical properties are usually measured directly in the air, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of a pseudo-physiological environment (PPE) on the mechanical properties of collagen gels. Furthermore, reinforcement was also tested using UV treatments (λ = 254 nm, 20 J/cm2), known to induce crosslinking. Irradiated samples were more resistant to enzymatic degradation and swelling tests showed that the crosslink density was increased by a factor of 30. This increase was thereafter correlated to the mechanical properties. Results showed that the UV-treated samples were stiffer and more brittle than the non-treated ones when tested in air. However, a 20% decrease and 40% increase were respectively measured on the linear modulus and strain at rupture when the gels were tested in the PPE. In the perspective of vascular tissue regeneration, these results show that the mechanical properties of a hydrogel should be performed in PPE in order to take into account the plasticization phenomenon that will occur in a bioreactor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

158-163

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.Y. Kannan, H.J. Salacinski, P.E. Butler, G. Hamilton and A.M. Seifalian: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials Vol. 74B (2005), pp.570-581.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30247

Google Scholar

[2] W. He, Z. Ma, T. Yong, W.E. Teo and S. Ramakrishna: Biomaterials Vol. 26 (2005), pp.7606-7615.

Google Scholar

[3] T.J. Koob: Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. (2004), pp.335-347.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Spoerl, G. Wollensak and T. Seiler: Current Eye Research Vol. 29 (2004), pp.35-40.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Tenni, M. Sonaggere, M. Viola, B. Bartolini, M.E. Tira, A. Rossi, E. Orsini, A. Ruggeri and V. Ottani: Micron Vol. 37 (2006), pp.640-647.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.01.011

Google Scholar

[6] S. Yunoki, N. Nagai, T. Suzuki and M. Munekata: Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering Vol. 98 (2004), pp.40-47.

Google Scholar

[7] S.M. Kuo, Y.J. Wang, C.L. Weng, H.E. Lu and S.J. Chang: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Vol. 16 (2005), pp.525-531.

Google Scholar

[8] K.G. Cornwell, P. Lei Stelios, T. Andreadis and G.D. Pins: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Vol. 80A (2007), pp.362-371.

Google Scholar

[9] B.P. Chan and K.F. So: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Vol. 75A (2005), pp.689-701.

Google Scholar

[10] M. -Y. Chen, Y. -L. Sun, C. Zhao, M.E. Zobitz, K. -N. An, S.L. Moran and P.C. Amadio: Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials Vol. 84 (2008), pp.218-223.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Wei, J. Twomey, G. Dongjie, K. Madhavan and L. Min: NanoBioscience, IEEE Transactions on Vol. 9 (2010), pp.111-120.

DOI: 10.1109/tnb.2010.2043367

Google Scholar

[12] H.M. Powell and S.T. Boyce: Tissue Eng Part A Vol. 15 (2009), pp.2177-2187.

Google Scholar

[13] X.N. Wang, X.D. Li and M.J. Yost: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Vol. 74A (2005), pp.263-268.

Google Scholar

[14] J.D. Berglund, R.M. Nerem and A. Sambanis: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Vol. 127 (2005), pp.1176-1184.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Leikin, D.C. Rau and V.A. Parsegian: Nature Structural Biology Vol. 2 (1995), pp.205-210.

Google Scholar

[16] M. Achilli, J. Lagueux and D. Mantovani: Macromolecular Bioscience Vol. 10 (2009), pp.307-316.

Google Scholar

[17] N. Rajan, J. Habermehl, M. -F. Côté, C.J. Doillon and D. Mantovani: Nature Protocols Vol. 1 (2006), pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[18] W. Doster and M. Settles: Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics Vol. 1749 (2005), pp.173-186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.03.010

Google Scholar