Evaluation of Surface Quality during Electrical Discharge Machining of Inconel 718 with Powder Metallurgy Electrodes

Article Preview

Abstract:

In recent years, researchers have reported powder metallurgy processed electrodes as alternative tooling for electrical discharge machining (EDM). The present experimental study evaluates the quality of machined surface during electrical discharge machining (EDM) of Inconel 718 alloy steel with powder metallurgy (PM) processed electrodes. The investigated process parameters were polarity, electrode type, peek current, pulse on time, duty cycle, gap voltage, retract distance and flushing pressure. The surface quality was measured in terms of surface roughness (Ra). An orthogonal array L36 (21X 37) based on Taguchi methodology was applied to plan and design experiments. Experimental data was statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and optimum condition was achieved for evaluation criteria. It was concluded that polarity, electrode type, peek current, have significant effect on surface quality and minimum Ra is obtained with CuW2080 electrode at minimum current and negative polarity. Deposition of tungsten with CuW2080 (80%W 20%Cu) electrode was confirmed by energy dispersion spectrum (EDS) of the machined surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

245-248

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang and A.R. Machado: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 86 (1999), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] P.F. Thomson: Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol. 5 (1989), p.1153.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Beri, S. Maheshwari, C. Sharma and A. Kumar: Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 25 (2010), p.1186.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Fukuzawa, Y. Kojima, T. Tani, E. Sekiguti and N. Mohri: Materials and Manufacturing Processes Vol. 10 (1995), p.195.

DOI: 10.1080/10426919508935015

Google Scholar

[5] L. Li, Y.S. Wong, J.Y.H. Fuh and L. Lu: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 113 (2001), p.563.

Google Scholar

[6] K.M. Shu and G.C. Tu: Materials and Manufacturing Processes. Vol. 16 (2001), p.483.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.C. Lin, C.H. Cheng, B.L. Su and L.R. Hwang: Materials and Manufacturing Processes Vol. 21 (2006), p.922.

Google Scholar

[8] Y.C. Lin, A.C. Wang, D.A. Wang, and C.C. Chen: Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 24 (2009), 667.

Google Scholar

[9] X. Cao, M. Xiao, M. Jahazi, J. Fournier and M. Alain: Materials and Manufacturing Processes Vol. 23 (2008), p.413.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Kumar, P. Kumar and H.S. Shan: Materials and Manufacturing Processes Vol. 23 (2008), p.719.

Google Scholar