Temporal Change in Fragmentation in China’s Primary Forest Ecoregions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Forests are of interest from a wide range of perspectives simply because they serve many purposes, including timber products, watershed protection, wildlife habitat, carbon sequestration, recreational opportunities and aesthetic values. However, degradation or changes in forest ecosystem function and condition arise from changes in forest loss and fragmentation. In this study, based on the 1995 and 2005 land use/cover data for China, mathematical morphology coupled with the percolation theory was adopted to temporally assess changes in forest fragmentation patterns in 36 forest ecosystems of China through classifying each forest pixel into one of the six fragmentation components (interior, perforated, patch, edge, transitional and undetermined) by using the sliding window analysis technique to establish spatially explicit forest fragmentation maps. Additionally, landscape indices were also involved in the assessment of forest fragmentation status and trends. Results revealed that an accelerated fragmentation was observed in most forest ecoregions, especially in Daurian forest stepp, Hainan Island monsoon rain forests, and Northern Indochina subtropical forests with a sharp change in fragmentation patterns. The increased fragmentation was evidenced by a decreasing share of interior forest and an increasing trend of area share for perforated forest, patch forest and edge forest. In addition, derivations of geospatial indices from another three selected typical forest ecoregions also further confirmed the accelerated fragmentation. The increased fragmentation in most forest ecoregions of China was primarily driven by anthropogenic disturbances, including illegal logging, agricultural encroachment, infrastructure construction. Additionally, forest fragmentation maps provided valuable insights and implications regarding the development of land use strategies, habitat planning for rare and endangered species, and sustainable forest management. By utilizing the changes in fragmentation maps, such as the variation in location of the interior and perforated components, human can make effective risk assessments and crucial targets for protection and remediation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)

Pages:

1286-1296

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. D. Wickham, K. H. Riitters, T. G. Wade, C. Homer, Temporal change in fragmentation of continental US forests, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 23, pp.891-898, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9258-z

Google Scholar

[2] P. R. Armsworth, B. E. Kendall, F. W. Davis, An introduction to biodiversity concepts for environmental economists, Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 26, pp.115-136, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.003

Google Scholar

[3] M. Schwartz, Conservation in Highly Fragmented landscapes. Chapman & Hall: New York, (1997).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Turner, H. Gardner, and R. O'Neill, Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer: New York, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Laurence, Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis, Biological Conversation, vol. 91, pp.109-117, (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Abdullah, N. Nakagoshi , Forest fragmentation and its correlations to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 241, pp.39-48, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.016

Google Scholar

[7] E. Dinerstein, G. Powell, D. Olson, E. Wikramanayake, et al., A Workbook for Conducting Biological Assessments and Developing Biodiversity Visions for Ecoregion-based Conservation. Conservation Science Program of WWF-US: Washington, DC, (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] B. Wu, C. Q. Zhu, D. Q. Li, K. Dong, X. L. Wang, and P. L. Shi, Setting biodiversity conservation priorities in the Forests of the Upper Yangtze Ecoregion based on ecoregion conservation methodology, Biodiversity Science, vol. 14(2), pp.87-97, (2006).

DOI: 10.1360/biodiv.050232

Google Scholar

[9] K. Riitters, J. Wickham, R. O'Neill, B. Jones, and E. Smith, Globe-scale patterns of forest fragmentation, Conservation Ecology, vol. 4 (2), p.3, (2000).

DOI: 10.5751/es-00209-040203

Google Scholar

[10] K. Riitters, J. Wickham, R. O'Neill, B. Jones, E. Smith, E. Coulston, T. Wade, and J. Smith, Fragmentation of continental United States forest, Ecosystems, vol. 5, pp.815-822, (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/s10021-002-0209-2

Google Scholar

[11] M. S. Li, Z. L. Zhu, H. Lv, D. Xu, A. X. Liu, and S. K. Peng, Assessment of forest geospatial patterns over the three giant forest areas of China, Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 19(1), pp.25-31, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s11676-008-0004-9

Google Scholar

[12] J. Hurd, E. Wilson, S. Lammey, D. Civco, Characterization of forest fragmentation and urban sprawl using time sequential Landsat imagery, ASPRS 2001 Annual Convention, St. Louis, MO, (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] G. G. Soledad, S. Santiago, Forest fragmentation estimated from remotely sensed data: is comparison across scales possible, Forest Science, vol. 51 (1), pp.51-63, (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] R. V. O'Neill, C. T. Hunsaker, S. P. Timmins, B. L. Jackson, K. B. Jones, K. H. Riitters, and J. D. Wickham, Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale, Landscape Ecology, vol. 11, pp.169-180, (1996).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02447515

Google Scholar

[15] M. S. Li, C. Q. Huang, Z. L. Zhu, H. Shi, H. Lv, and S. K. Peng, Assessing rates of forest change and fragmentation in Alabama, USA, using the vegetation change tracker model, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 257, pp.1480-1488, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.023

Google Scholar

[16] L. Cayuela, J. Benayas, and C. Echeverria, Clearance and fragmentation of tropical montane forests in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico (1975–2000), Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 226, p.208–218, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.047

Google Scholar

[17] C. Echeverria, D. Coomes, J. Salas, J. Benayas, A. Lara, and A. Newton, Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean Temperate Forests, Biological Conservation, vol. 130(4), p.481–494, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[18] J. Mackinnon, M. Sha, C. Cheung, G. Carey, X. Zhu, and D. Melville, A Biodiversity Review of China. World Wide Fund for Nature: Hong Kong, (1996).

Google Scholar

[19] D. Stauffer, Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis: Philadelphia, (1985).

Google Scholar

[20] H. Li, J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, and T. A. Spies, Developing alternative forest cutting patterns: A simulation approach, Landscape Ecology, vol. 8(1), pp.63-75, (1993).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00129867

Google Scholar

[21] M. G. Turner, Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns, Landscape Ecology, vol. 4(1), pp.21-30, (1990).

Google Scholar

[22] K. H. Riitters, R. V. O'Neill, C. T. Hunsaker, J. D. Wickham, D. H. Yankee, S. P. Timmins, K. B. Jones, and B. L. Jackson, A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10(1), pp.23-39, (1995).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00158551

Google Scholar

[23] W. H. Li, Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 201, p.33–41, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.010

Google Scholar

[24] Y. F. Zhang, S. Tachibana, and S. Nagata, Impact of socio-economic factors on the changes in forest areas in China, Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 9(1), pp.63-76, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.005

Google Scholar

[25] P. Angelstam, Predation on ground-nesting birds' nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge, Oikos, vol. 47, pp.365-373, (1986).

DOI: 10.2307/3565450

Google Scholar

[26] H. Andren, Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation a landscape perspective, Ecology, vol. 73, pp.794-804, (1992).

DOI: 10.2307/1940158

Google Scholar