A Framework for Evaluating R&D Process Using a Best Practice Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recently a strong increase in R&D investment has encouraged a firm to create a more effective and efficient R&D process, which allows it to save time and costs significantly. In order to build such a process, a firm should be able to evaluate its process, based on which the process can be improved. With all its importance and value, however, the previous studies on R&D process have seldom focused on the method of evaluating the process. Therefore this study aims to develop a framework for evaluating R&D process. For the purpose, CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integrated) is used as a main method, which is a process improvement approach that provides organizations with the essential elements of effective processes that ultimately improve their performance and thus considered suitable for this research. We tried to develop a framework for evaluating R&D process based on the CMMI approach by modifying it to be suitable for measuring R&D performance where the essential elements for effective R&D process are obtained from the literature on best practices. A simple case study was conducted to illustrate how the proposed framework could be applied. The research results are expected to guide R&D process improvement across a project, a division, or an entire organization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)

Pages:

1620-1628

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Godener, K. E. Soderquist, Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: an exploratory study, R&D Management, vol. 34, no. 2, March 2004, pp.191-219.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00333.x

Google Scholar

[2] R. Balachandra, H. J. Friar, Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework, IEEE Tracsactions on Engineering Management, vol. 44, no. 3, August 1997, pp.276-287.

DOI: 10.1109/17.618169

Google Scholar

[3] R. G. Cooper, Benchmarking New Product Performance: Results of the Best Practices Study, European Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, February1998, pp.1-17.

Google Scholar

[4] J. M. Utterback, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, May (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/s0737-6782(95)90049-7

Google Scholar

[5] C. Loch, L. Stein and C. Terweisch, Mesuring development performance in the electronics industry, Journal of Product Innovation Mangement, vol. 13, no. 1, January 1996, pp.3-20.

Google Scholar

[6] K. B. Kahn, G. Barczak, R. Moss, PERSPECTIVE: Establishing an NPD Best Practices Framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 23, no. 2, March 2006, pp.106-116.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00186.x

Google Scholar

[7] M. Adams-Bigelow, Rejoinders to 'Establishing an NPD Best Practices Framework', ', Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 23, no. 2, March 2006, pp.117-127.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00187_1.x

Google Scholar

[8] G. Barczak, A. Griffin, and K. B. Kahn, PERSPECTIVE: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best practice study, Journal of Product Inovation Management, vol. 26, no. 1, January 2009, pp.3-23.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00331.x

Google Scholar

[9] A. Griffin, PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 14, no. 6, November 1997, pp.429-458.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1460429

Google Scholar

[10] H. Driva, K. S. Pawar, U. Menon, Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organisations, Production Economics, vol. 63, no. 2, January 2000, pp.147-159.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(99)00007-9

Google Scholar

[11] K. J. Dooley, A. Subra, J. Anderson, Adoption rates and patterns of best practices in new product development, International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 6, no. 1, March 2002, pp.85-103.

DOI: 10.1142/s1363919602000525

Google Scholar

[12] D. Matheson, J. Matheson, The Smart Organization: creating value through strategic R&D, Harvard Business school Press, Boston, MA, (1998).

Google Scholar

[13] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Stage-Gate and the Critical Success Factors for New Product Development, BPTrends, July (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] D. L. Ransley, J. L. Rogers, A Consensus on Best R&D Practices, Research Technology Management, vol. 37, no. 2, March-April1994, pp.8-19.

Google Scholar

[15] CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Development version 1. 2, Technical report, (2006).

Google Scholar

[16] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Optimizing the Stage-Gate® Process - What Best Practice Companies Are Doing - Part I, Research Technology Management, vol. 45, no. 5, September-October 2002, pp.21-27.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671518

Google Scholar

[17] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Optimizing the Stage-Gate® Process - What Best Practice Companies Are Doing - Part II, Research Technology Management, vol. 45, no. 6, November-December 2002, pp.43-49.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671532

Google Scholar

[18] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Benchmarking best NPD practices – part 1, Research Technology Management, vol. 47, no. 1, January-February 2004, pp.31-43.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2004.11671606

Google Scholar

[19] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Benchmarking best NPD practices – part 2, Research Technology Management, vol. 47, no. 3, May-June 2004, pp.50-59.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2004.11671630

Google Scholar

[20] R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett, E. J. Kleinschmidt, Benchmarking best NPD practices – part 3, Research Technology Management, vol. 47, no. 6, November-December 2004, pp.43-55.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2004.11671662

Google Scholar

[21] K. Cormican, D. O'Sullivan, Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management, Technovation, vol. 24, no. 10, October 2004, pp.819-829.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00013-0

Google Scholar