Longitudinal Flight Dynamics of Baseline-II BWB UAV

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of this paper is to investigate longitudinal flight dynamics of the said aircraft at loitering flight condition near sea level. Three mathematical dynamic models are used to compute transient response of Baseline-II E-2 BWB along with a proposed model known as Model-N. Model-N is derived to incorporate as many important derivatives, including gravitational and pitch angle factor, as possible. While all these four dynamic models are different in a sense where one model is more simple or complex than the others, the basic architecture of all these models are the same. This paper shows the short-period mode needs serious attention. A control algorithm is needed to overcome its handicap which is below Level 3 damping ratio according to MIL-F-8785C. Improvement to phugoid can be considered secondary, but one must ensure that bringing short period mode to Level 1 flying quality does not make phugiod mode response worse than it is now.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)

Pages:

6636-6640

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rizal E. M. Nasir, Wahyu Kuntjoro, Wirachman Wisnoe, Zurriati Ali, Nor F. Reduan, Firdaus Mohamad, Shahrizal Suboh, Preliminary Design of "Baseline-II" Blended Wing-Body (BWB) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): Achieving Higher Aerodynamic Efficiency Through Planform Redesign and Low-Fidelity Inverse Twist Method, Proceedings of 3rd Engineering Conference on Advancement in Mechanical and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment (EnCon2010), Kuching, Malaysia, April 14-16, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773934

Google Scholar

[2] Wirachman Wisnoe, Wahyu Kuntjoro, Firdaus Mohamad, Rizal Effendy Mohd Nasir, Nor F Reduan, Zurriati Ali, Experimental Results Analysis for UiTM BWB Baseline-I and Baseline-II UAV Running at 0. 1 Mach number, International Journal of Mechanics, Issue 2, Volume 4, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773934

Google Scholar

[3] Rizal E.M. Nasir, Wahyu Kuntjoro, Wirachman Wisnoe Zurriati M. Ali, Nor F. Reduan, Firdaus Mohamad, The Effect of Canard on Aerodynamics and Static Stability of Baseline-II Blended Wing-Body Aircraft at Low Subsonic Speed, Proceedings of the 4th World Engineering Congress 2010 (WEC 2010), Kuching, Malaysia, August 2-5, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773934

Google Scholar

[4] Rizal E. M. Nasir, Wahyu Kuntjoro, Wirachman Wisnoe, Zurriati Ali, Norfazira Reduan, Firdaus Mohamad, Ramzyzan Ramly, Aerodynamics and Longitudinal Static Stability of Baseline-II Blended Wing-Body Aircraft Variants, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME 2010), Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2-5, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773932

Google Scholar

[5] Rizal E. M. Nasir, Wahyu Kuntjoro, Wirachman Wisnoe, Zurriati Mohd. Ali, Norfazira Reduan, Firdaus Mohamad, Ramzyzan Ramly, Static Stability of Baseline-II Blended Wing-Body Aircraft at Low Subsonic Speed: Investigation via Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation, 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 5-7, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cssr.2010.5773932

Google Scholar

[6] J. Roskam. Airplane Design: Part VI: Preliminary Calculation of aerodynamic, thrust and Power Characteristics. 2nd Print. Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, Kansas (1990).

Google Scholar

[7] R. C. Nelson. Flight Stability and Automatic Control. 2nd. Ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] M.V. Cook. Flight Dynamics Principles. 2nd Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier, Oxford, (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] S. Pradeep. A Century of Phugoid Approximations., Aircraft Design 1. (1998) pp.89-1. 4.

Google Scholar

[10] MIL-F-8785C Military Standard: Flying Qualities of piloted Airplanes (1980).

Google Scholar