Modification of Neuron PID Control in Case of Improper Learning Factors

Abstract:

Some modifications of conventional neuron proportional-integral-differential controller (NPID) are presented in this paper to prevent its slow dynamic response and loss of control in case of improper learning factors. The quasi-step signal replaces the step signal as the reference signal to improve the dynamic characteristics. The control output of NPID is modified every step by multiplying a penalty factor called senior teacher signal to suppress further the overshoot and compress the settling time. The steady-state error from the modified NPID (MNPID) is reduced or removed by adjusting dynamically reference input signal while excluding the pseudo steady state. Lots of simulation experiments are done to prove the stability and convergence of the MNPID control algorithm.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)
• Pages: 6795-6801
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.6795
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Xue Gui Zhu, Zhi Hong Fu, Xing Zhe Hou
• Keywords: Learning Factors, Neuron, Proportional-Integral-Differential (PID), Self-Adaptive Control, Senior Teacher Signal

References

[1] X. YUAN, Y. WANG and L. WU, Composite feedforward　feedback controller for generator excitation system, Nonlinear Dyn, 2008(54), p.355–364.

DOI: 10.1007/s11071-008-9334-6

[2] A. Godhwani and M. J. Basler, A digital excitation control system for use on brushless excited synchronous generator, IEEE T ENERGY CONVER, 1996, 11(3) , pp.616-620.

DOI: 10.1109/60.537033

[3] K. Kim, R. C. Schaefer, Tuning a PID controller for a digital excitation control system, IEEE T IND APPL, 2005, 41(2) , pp.485-492.

DOI: 10.1109/tia.2005.844368

[4] Serdar E. Hamamci, Stabilization using fractional-order PI and PID controllers, Nonlinear Dyn, 2008, (51) , p.329–343.

DOI: 10.1007/s11071-007-9214-5

[5] P. H. Chang and J. H. Jung, A systematic method for gain selection of robust PID control for nonlinear plants of second-order controller canonical form, IEEE T CONTR SYST T, 2009, 17(2) , pp.473-483.

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2008.2000989

[6] J. G. Ziegler and N. B. Nichols, Optimum settings for automatic controllers, Trans. ASME, 1942, (64) , p.759–768.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4019269

[7] I. L. Chien and P. S. Fruehauf, Consider IMC tuning to improve controller performance, Chem. Eng. Prog, 1990, 86(10) , p.33–41.

[8] D. Chen and D. A. Seborg, PI/PID controller design based on direct synthesis and disturbance rejection, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 2002, (41) , p.4807–4822.

DOI: 10.1021/ie010756m

[9] A. O. Dwyer, PI and PID controller tuning rule design for processes with delay, to achieve constant gain and phase margins for all values of delay, Sig. Sys. Conf. Maynooth, Ireland, 2001, p.96–100.

[10] G. K. Mann, B. G. HU and R. G. Gosine, Time-domain based design and analysis of new PID tuning rule, IEE Proc. -Control Theory Appl, 2001, 148 (3) , pp.251-161.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:20010464

[11] Z. WANG and H. ZHANG, Global Asymptotic Stability of Reaction–Diffusion Cohen–Grossberg Neural Networks with Continuously Distributed Delays, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2010, 21(1) , pp.39-49.

DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2009.2033910

[12] Y. TAN, X. DANG and C. Van, PID Gradient Algorithm for Neural Network Based Generalized Nonlinear PID Controller, J Control Theory Appl, 2000, 17(6) , pp.861-867.

[13] Y. ZHANG, Updating learning rates for backpropagation network, Proceedings of 1993 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Nagoya, pp.569-572, (1993).

DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1993.713979