Preliminary Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Extracts from Actinidia macrosperma

Yin Lu; Yun Peng Zhao; Cheng Xin Fu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.455-456.1200

Paper Titles

Study on the Inclusion Complex of Rutin/Sulfobutylether-β-Cyclodextrin
p.1177

A Improved Method for Study on Biodegradation of Castor Based Lubricants
p.1182

Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide Residue in Food Using CdS Quantum Dots as Fluorescence Probes
p.1189

Determination of Trace Iron in Chinese Herbal Medicine Using CdS Quantum Dots as Fluorescence Probes
p.1195

Preliminary Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Extracts from Actinidia macrosperma
p.1200

Impacts of Uranyl Ion on the Structure and Function of Cytochrome b₅ His39Ser Mutant
p.1204

Synthesis and Application of a Novel Polymer as an Antimicrobial and Water and Oil Repellent Finishing Agent for Cotton
p.1210

Synthesis of Myristyl Sulpho Betaine Type Amphoteric Surfactant
p.1217

Internalization of DMSA-Coated Fe₃O₄ Magnetic Nanoparticles into Mouse Macrophage Cells
p.1221

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 455-456Preliminary Evaluation of Antimicrobial and...

Preliminary Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Extracts from Actinidia macrosperma

Abstract:

The petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate, n-hexane and aqueous successive extracts from the stems of Actinidia macrosperma C. F. Liang have been screened for antibacterial and antifungal activities in vitro using the disc diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)/minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). General toxicity of these extracts has also been assessed by brine shrimp lethality assay. The chloroform extract exhibited the most significant antimicrobial (MIC in the range of 60–500μg/ml, MBC in the range of 150–1000μg/ml, MFC in the range of 170–600μg/ml) and cytotoxic activities (LC₅₀=16.82μg/ml at 24 hours).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Future Material Research and Industry Application

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 455-456)

Pages:

1200-1203

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.455-456.1200

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Yin Lu, Yun Peng Zhao, Cheng Xin Fu

Keywords:

Actinidia macrosperma, Antimicrobial Activity, Brine Shrimp, Cytotoxicity

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] M. King, B. Zhu, and S. Tang, Optimal path planning, Mobile Robots, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.520-531.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Simpson, Dumb Robots, 3rd ed., Springfield: UOS Press, 2004, pp.6-9. Lai PF, Zhang HY. Journal of Zhejiang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2002; 26(1): 77.

Google Scholar

[3] M. King and B. Zhu, Gaming strategies, in Path Planning to the West, vol. II, S. Tang and M. King, Eds. Xian: Jiaoda Press, 1998, pp.158-176.

Google Scholar

[4] Jiang WM, Ding BY, Zhu XN. The Chinese Academic Medical Magazine of Organisms 2003; 39(6): 39.

Google Scholar

[5] Yao G, Wang TS. Traditional Chinese Materials 1989; 12(2): 15.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface, IEEE Translated J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp.740-741.

DOI: 10.1109/tjmj.1987.4549593

Google Scholar

[7] M. Young, The Technical Writer's Handbook, Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989. McGhie TK, Ainge GD. J Agric Food Chem 2002; 50(1): 117.

Google Scholar

[8] Lu Y, Chen SY, Wu P, Chan G, Fu CX. Journal of Zhejiang University 2004; 30(2): 185.

Google Scholar

[9] Feng YT, Chen SY, Jiang WM, Fu CX. Journal of Zhejiang University 2004; 30(2): 189.

Google Scholar

[10] Xu RS, Chen ZL. Extraction and Separation Process of Effective Components on Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2nd ed. Shanghai, China: The Shanghai Scientific and Technical Press, 1983. p.255.

Google Scholar

[11] Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45: 493.

Google Scholar

[12] Gnanamanickam SS, Smith DA. Phytopathol 1980; 70: 894.

Google Scholar

[13] Zgoda JR, Porter JR. Pharmaceutical Biology 2001; 39(3): 221.

Google Scholar

[14] Irobi ON, Daramala SO. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1994; 42: 39.

Google Scholar

[15] Meyer BN, Ferrigni RN, Putnam JE, Jacobsen LB, Nichols DE, McLaughlin JL. Planta Medica 1982; 45: 31.

DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-971236

Google Scholar

[16] Walker R, Edwards C. Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, 1999. p.497.

Google Scholar