Review on Dynamic Membrane Reactor (DMBR) for Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment

Abstract:

The dynamic membrane reactor (DMBR) combined the advantages of both microbial reactor and dynamic membrane, and it’s a new municipal wastewater treatment technology. This paper summarized the technical processes, mechanisms, characteristics and application of DMBR, and the future research aspects of DMBR is also included.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 455-456)
• Pages: 1278-1284
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.455-456.1278
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Xiao Ya Sun, Hua Qiang Chu, Ya Lei Zhang, Xue Fei Zhou
• Keywords: DMBR, Mechanism, Review, Structure

References

[1] Hongbo Liu, et al, Formation mechanism and structure of dynamic membrane in the dynamic membrane bioreactor, Chemical Engineering Journal, 148 (2009) 290–295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.043

[2] W. Fuchs, C. Resch, M. Kernstock, M. Mayer, and P. Schoeberl, Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process, Water Research, vol. 39, p.803–810, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.001

[3] Yoshiaki Kiso, Yong-jun Jung, Takashi Ichinari, Minsoo Park, and Takane Kitao, Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equiped with a mesh as a filter material, Water Research, vol. 34(17), pp.4143-4150, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00201-3

[4] Bin Fan and Xia Huang, Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment, Environmental Science & Technology. vol. 36(23), pp.5245-5251, (2002).

DOI: 10.1021/es025789n

[5] V.T. Kuberkar, R. H. Davis, Modelling of fouling reduction by secondary membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 168 (2000) 243-258.

[6] P. Cote, H. Buisson, M. Praderie, Immersed membranes activated sludge process applied to the treatment of municipal wastewater, Water Sci. Technol, 38 (1998) 437-442.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1998.0688

[7] Y. Miura, Y. Watanabe, S. Okabe, Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater: Impact of biofilm formation, Environ, Sci. Technol. 41 (2) (2007) 632-638.

DOI: 10.1021/es0615371

[8] Z. W. Wang, Z. C. Wu, G. P. Yu, J. F. Liu, Z, Zhou, Relationship between sludge characteristics and membrane flux determination in submerged membrane bioreactors, J. Membr. Sci. 284 (2006) 87-94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.006

[9] P. Le-Clech, V. Chen, T. A. G. Fang, Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci. 284 (2006) 17-53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019

[10] K. Kimura, N. Yamato, H. Yamamura, Y. Watanabe, Membrane biofouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater, Envirion. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 6293-6299.

DOI: 10.1021/es0502425

[11] B. Q. Liao, Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications and research directions, Crit. Rev. Sci. Technol. 36 (2006) 489-530.

[12] Marcinkowsky A. E, Kraus K A, Phillips H O, et al. Hyperfiltration studies. IV. Salt rejection by dynamically formed hydrous oxide membranes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1966, 88: 5744-5750.

DOI: 10.1021/ja00976a013

[13] Vinod T. Kuberlar and Robert H. Davis, Modelling of fouling reduction by secondary membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 168, pp.243-258, (2000).

[14] H. S. Lee, S. J. Park. Wastewater treatment in a hybrid biological reactor using powdered minerals: effects of organic loading rates on COD removal and nitrification [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2003, 38 (1): 81-88.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(02)00044-4

[15] J. Y. Jung, et al. Son. Enhanced ammonia nitrogen removal using consistent biological regeneration and ammonium exchange of zeolite in modified SBR process [J]. Water Research, 2004, 38 (2): 347-354.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.025

[16] Smith P J, Vigneswaran S, et al. A new approach to backwash initiation in membrane systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 278: 381-389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.024

[17] Remize P J, et al. From a new method to consider backwash efficiency to the definition of remaining fouling. Desalination, 2006, 199: 86-88.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.148

[18] Bourgeous K N, Darby J L, Tchobanoglous G. Ultrafiltration of wastewater: Effects of particles, mode of operation, and backwash effectiveness. Water Research, 2001, 35 (1): 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00225-6

[19] S. Gao, Z. Y. Zhou, et al. Application of self-forming Biodynamic Membrane in Sludge Retaining. Water Purification. 2005. 24 (01).

[20] Kiso. Y, Jung Y J, Ichinari T, et al. Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Research, 2000, 34 (17): 4143-4150.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00201-3

[21] Remize P J, et al. Form a new method to consider backwash efficiency to the definition of remaining fouling. Desalination, 2006, 199: 86-88.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.148

[22] Bourgeous K N, et al. Ultrafiltration of wastewater: Effects of particles, mode of operation, and backwash effectiveness. Water Research, 2001, 35 (1): 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00225-6

[23] H. M. Zhang, S. Qiao, et al. Domestic Wastewater Treatment with Precoating Dynamic Membrane Bio-reactor. ACTA Scientiae Circumustantiae. 2005. 25. (2).

[24] Al-Malack M H, Anderson G K. Cleaning techniques of dynamic membrane. Separation Purification Technology, 1997, 12 : 25-33.

DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(97)00012-9

[25] F. Li, J. Li, et al. Application of Dynamic Membrane to Crossflow Microfiltration. Technology of Water Treatment, 2005. 31 (12).

[26] J. Zhang, X. F. Qiu, et al. Online Aeration Backwashing in the Inverse DIRECTION OF Effluent Applied in Dynamic Membrane Bio-reactor. Environment Science. 2007. 28 (6).

[27] T. Janus, et al, Modelling SMP and EPS formation and degradation kinetics with an extended A3M3 model, Desalination 261 (2010) 117-125.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.05.021