Modeling the Glass Transition Temperature of Polymers via Multipole Moments Using Support Vector Regression

Article Preview

Abstract:

. This study introduces support vector regression (SVR) approach to model the relationship between the glass transition temperature (Tg) and multipole moments for polymers. SVR was trained and tested via 60 samples by using two quantum chemical descriptors including the molecular traceless quadrupole moment and the molecular average hexadecapole moment Φ. The prediction performance of SVR was compared with that of reported quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) model. The results show that the mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of training samples and test samples achieved by SVR model, are smaller than those achieved by the QSPR model, respectively. This investigation reveals that SVR-based modeling is a practically useful tool in prediction of the glass transition temperature of polymers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 455-456)

Pages:

430-435

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.H. Lin and K. Argasinski, Fluoropolymer alloys: performance optimization of PVDF alloys, in Fluopolymers 2: Properties, G. Hougham, P.E. Cassidy, K. Johns and T. Davison (editors), New York: Plenum Press, vol. 122, (1999).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Krause, J.J. Gormley, N. Roman, J.A. Shetter and W.H. Wantanade, Glass temperatures of some acrylic polymers, J. Polym. Sci. A-Polym. Chem., vol. 3, pp.3573-3586, (1965).

DOI: 10.1002/pol.1965.100031020

Google Scholar

[3] A.R. Katrizky, P. Pachwal, K.W. Law, M. Karelson and V.S. Lobanov, Prediction of polymer glass transition temperature using a general quantitative structure-property relationship treatment, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., vol. 36, pp.879-884, (1996).

DOI: 10.1021/ci950156w

Google Scholar

[4] J. Bicerano, Prediction of polymers properties. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, (1996).

Google Scholar

[5] P. Camelio, C.C. Cypcar, V. lazzeri and B. Waegell, A novel approach toward the prediction of the glass transition temperature: application of the EVM model, a designer QSPR equation for the prediction of acrylate and methacrylate polymers, J. Polym. Sci. A-Polym. Chem., vol. 35, pp.2579-2591, (1997).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(19970930)35:13<2579::aid-pola5>3.0.co;2-m

Google Scholar

[6] W.Q. Liu and C.Z. Cao. Colloid, Artificial neural network prediction of glass transition temperature of polymers, Polym. Sci., vol. 287, pp.811-818, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00396-009-2035-y

Google Scholar

[7] C. Duce, A. Micheli, R. Solaro, A. Starita and M.R. Tine, Recursive neural networks predictions of glass transition temperature from monomer structure: an application to acylic and methacrylic polymers, J. Math. Chem., vol. 46, pp.729-755, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10910-009-9547-z

Google Scholar

[8] S.J. Joyce and D.J. Osguthorpe, Neural network prediction of glass- transition temperatures from monomer structure, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., vol. 91, pp.2491-2496, (1995).

DOI: 10.1039/ft9959102491

Google Scholar

[9] J.F. Dai, S.L. Liu, Y. Chen and C.Z. Cao, A quantitative structure- property relationship study on glass transition temperature of polyacrylates, Acta. Polym. Sinica, vol. 3, pp.343-347, (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] X.L. Yu, B. Yi, X.Y. Wang and Z.M. Xie, Correlation between the glass transition temperatures and multipole moments for polymers, Chemical Physics, vol. 332, pp.115-118, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.11.029

Google Scholar

[11] V. Vapnik, The natural of statistical learning theory, New York: Springer, (1995).

Google Scholar

[12] C.Z. Cai, X.J. Zhu, Y.F. Wen, J.F. Pei and G.L. Wang, Predicting the superconducting transition temperature Tc of BiPbSrCaCuOF superconductors by using support vector regression, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., vol. 23, pp.737-740, (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s10948-010-0732-x

Google Scholar

[13] D.O. Whiteson, and N.A. Naumann, Support vector regression as a signal discriminator in high energy physics, Neurocomputing, vol. 55, pp.251-264, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-2312(03)00366-7

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Yuan and B.X. Huang, Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression, Proteins, vol. 57, pp.558-564, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/prot.20234

Google Scholar

[15] C.Z. Cai, W.L. Wang, L.Z. Sun and Y.Z. Chen, Protein function classification via support vector machine approach, Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 185, no. 2, pp.111-122, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(03)00096-8

Google Scholar

[16] C.Z. Cai, L.Y. Han, Z.L. Ji, X. Chen and Y.Z. Chen. SVM-Prot: web-based support vector machine software for functional classification of a protein from its primary sequence, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, pp.3692-3697, (2003).

DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg600

Google Scholar

[17] C.Z. Cai, W.L. Wang and Y.Z. Chen, Support vector machine classification of physical and biological datasets, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, vol. 14, pp.575-585, (2003).

DOI: 10.1142/s0129183103004759

Google Scholar

[18] J. Song and K. Burrage, Predicting residue-wise contact orders in proteins by support vector regression, BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, p.425, (2006).

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-425

Google Scholar

[19] Y.F. Wen, C.Z. Cai, X.H. Liu, J.F. Pei, X.J. Zhu and T.T. Xiao, Corrosion rate prediction of 3C steel under different seawater environment by using support vector regression, Corrosion Science, vol. 51, pp.349-355, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.038

Google Scholar

[20] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp.1942-1948, (1995).

Google Scholar