Polylactic Acid/Impact Modifier Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of four impact modifiers: natural rubber (NR), poly (cis-1,4-isoprene) (IR), poly (acrylonitrile-co-butadiene) (NBR) and poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (PEVA), on the morphology, thermal and tensile properties by solution blending of poly (lactic acid) and 5 and 10 wt% impact modifier were investigated. Results showed that Youngs modulus and T.S. at break decreased in all PLA/impact modifier blends. In addition, Youngs modulus in all blends and T.S. at break in PLA/NR, PLA/IR and PLA/NBR blends was not significantly affected by the type and content of impact modifiers in the blends, but T.S. at break in PLA/PEVA blends was decreased by increasing the PVEA content from 5 wt% to 10 wt%. By contrast, the elongation at break significantly increased in all PLA/impact modifier blends and only PLA/NBR blends was affected by the content of impact modifier. Finally, the increase in ductility of all PLA/impact modifier blends confirmed the toughening capability of all impact modifiers. Thus, it is evident from tensile properties obtained indicated that PLA/impact modifier blends exhibit greater flexibility with all impact modifiers. Phase separation morphology of dispersion of impact modifier in PLA matrix indicating poor interfacial adhesion was observed. Tg and Tm of PLA/impact modifier blends exhibited almost the same as pure PLA, this suggested that there was no molecular interaction between PLA and impact modifiers, therefore, the PLA/impact modifier blends were immiscible.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

406-411

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.Z. Liu and J.W. Zhang: J. Polym. Sci. Pt. B: Polym. Phys. Vol. 49 (2011), p.1051.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ishida, R. Nagasaki, K. Chino, T. Dong and Y. Inoue: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 113 (2009), p.558.

Google Scholar

[3] K.A. Afrifah and L.M. Matuana: Macromol. Mater. Eng. Vol. 295 (2010), p.802.

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http: /www. 4spepro. org/pdf/003515/003515. pdf.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Odent, J.M. Raquez, E. Duquesne and P. Dubois: Eur. Polym. J. Vol. 48 (2012), p.331.

Google Scholar

[6] R.M. Taib, Z.A. Ghaleb and Z.A.M. Ishak: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 123 (2012), p.2715.

Google Scholar

[7] X.G. Ge, S. George, S. Law and M. Sain: J. Macromol. Sci. Pt. B: Phys. Vol. 50 (2011), p. (2070).

Google Scholar

[8] E-R. Kenawy, G.L. Bowlin, K. Mansfield, J. Layman, D.G. Simpson, E. H. Sanders and G.E. Wnek: J. Control. Release Vol. 81 (2002), p.57.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Somdee, B. Suksut, C. Deeprasertkul, in: Proceedings of the Pure and Applied Chemistry International Conference (PACCON) (2009), pp.310-6.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Boonfaung, P. Wasutchanon, and A. Somwangthanaroj, in: Proceedings of the Pure and Applied Chemistry International Conference (PACCON) (2011), p.621.

Google Scholar