Comparative Study of RANS and LES Simulation Methods for Analysis of Turbulence in a Tubular Stirred Reactor

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selecting a right simulation method is important for accurately predicting flow field in stirred reactor. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach with standard model and large eddy simulations (LES) method were both used to analyze the turbulent flow field in a tubular stirred reactor for leaching. Calculations were performed to study the effects of agitator speed and flux on the turbulent flow field. The velocity at different axial sections gained by the two methods was compared. Results showed that the eddy current, especially in the back of impellor, predicted by LES was better than that by standard model. At the same time,the average relative error of the mean residence time and the mixing time of the former reduced 5% and 13% respectively than that of the latter.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

218-222

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xin Gu. Numerical Simulation of Shell-and-tube Heat Exchanger and Research on Sideling-flow Heat Exchanger. [D]. ZhengZhou city: ZhengZhou univercity,2006, 19-22.

Google Scholar

[2] Yi Miao, JiaZhen Pan, Jian Min, et al. Large Eddy Simulation of Mixing Process in Stirred Tank with Rushton Turbine [J], Journal of East China University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition, 2006,32(5):623-628.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Tyagia. Simulation of laminar and turbulent impeller stirred tanks using immersed boundary method and large eddy simulation technique in multi-block curvilinear geometries [J], Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62: 1351-1363.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.11.017

Google Scholar

[4] J. Pan, E. Loth. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of airfoils and wins with ice shapes[J], Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(4): 879-891.

DOI: 10.2514/1.587

Google Scholar

[5] V. Michelassi, J. G. Wissink, W. Rodi. Direct numerical simulation, large eddy simulation and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of periodic unsteady flow in a low-pressure turbine cascade: A comparison [J], Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2003, 217(4): 403-412.

DOI: 10.1243/095765003322315469

Google Scholar

[6] Ting'an Zhang, Qiuyue Zhao, Zhihe Dou, et al. internal loop multi-tubular digestion reactor [P]. ZL 200510047338. 3.

Google Scholar

[7] Qiuyue Zhao. Design and physical and numerical simulation on flow characteristic of multi stirred tubular reactor [D]. ShenYang city: Northeastern University. 2008, 33-51.

Google Scholar

[8] Luo J V, Gosman A D, Issa R I, et al. Fitzgerald M K. Full flow field computation of mixing in baffled stirred reactors [J]. Trans IChemE 1993, 71A: 342-344.

Google Scholar

[9] Luo J V, Issa R I , Gosman A D. Prediction of impeller induced flows in mixing vessels using multiple frames of reference[J]. IChemE Symp Ser 163, 1994, 549-556.

Google Scholar

[10] Chengyao Wang, Zhenghua Wang, Xiaohui Yang. Computational fluid dynamics and parallel algorithm [M]. Changsha city, Press of National University of Defense Technology, China, (2000).

Google Scholar

[11] Guozhong Zhou; Yingcen Wang and Litian SHI. CFD study of mixing process in stirred tank [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2003, (54)7, 886-890.

Google Scholar