Calculation of Electronic Properties of InAs/GaAs Cubic, Spherical and Pyramidal Quantum Dots with Finite Difference Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

We have calculated the properties of electron states in an InAs/GaAs quantum dot system based on the effective mass approximation of a one-band Hamiltonian model. This semiconductor nanostructure system consisted of an InAs quantum dot embedded in a GaAs substrate. In this paper, the Schrödinger equation of an ideal cubic quantum dot with infinite barrier was solved using a finite difference approach. The sparse matrix of N3 x N3 for the Hamiltonian was diagonalized to calculate the lowest states of electrons in this nanostructure system. The calculation was performed for different dot size and the obtained energy levels are comparable to those calculated analytically. The finite difference method was relatively faster and applicable to quantum dots of any geometry or potential profile. This was proven by applying the developed computational procedure to quantum dots of cubic, spherical and pyramidal geometries for the InAs/GaAs nanostructure system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

347-351

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Ogawa, T. Kunimasa, T. Ito & T. Miyoshi, Finite-element analysis of quantum wires with arbitrary cross sections, J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 3242–3249.

DOI: 10.1063/1.368478

Google Scholar

[2] S. Tarucha, D. G. Austing, T. Honda, R. J. van der Hage & L. P. Kouwenhoven, Shell Filling and Spin Effects in a Few Electron Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3613-3616.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.77.3613

Google Scholar

[3] J. M. Gerard, J. Y. Marzin, G. Zimmermann, A. Ponchet, O. Cabrol, D. Barrier, B. Jusserand, & B. Sermage, InAs/GaAs quantum boxes obtained by self-organized growth: intrinsic electronic properties and applications, Solid State Electronics 40 (1996) 807-814.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(95)00367-3

Google Scholar

[4] S. Gangopahdhyay, & B.R. Nag, Energy levels in finite barrier triangular and arrowhead-shaped quantum wires, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 7885–7889.

DOI: 10.1063/1.365361

Google Scholar

[5] M. Tadi´c. & Z. Ikoni´c, Self-consistent electronic-structure calculation of rectangular modulation-doped GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs quantum wires, Phys. Rev. B50 (1994) 7680-7688.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Li & J. Xia, Electronic states of InAs/GaAs quantum ring, J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 3434–3437.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1347409

Google Scholar

[7] O. Stier & D. Bimberg, Modeling of strained quantum wires using eight-band k⋅p theory, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 7726–7732.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.7726

Google Scholar

[8] A. Endoh, S. Sasa, H. Arimoto, & S. Muto, Numerical simulation of electron diffraction through a narrow constriction, J. Appl. Phys. 86 (1999) 6249–6255.

DOI: 10.1063/1.371680

Google Scholar

[9] C. Delerue & M. Lannoo, Nanostructures: Theory and Modelling, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

Google Scholar

[10] O. Madelung, Semiconductor: Data handbook, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

Google Scholar